On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:39 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
> except, as i've patiently mentioned each time people very kindly contribute
> their insights: the project leader, ignatius, has made it absolutely
> clear that any efforts to provide insights - even sadly yours, casey,
> are ne
Hi all,
I changed the subject of my reply to "On The Code of Conduct", so as
not to mix threads of conversation.
Please keep in mind that this is only my interpretation of the code of
conduct. I am on the Grin moderation team, but this is not an official
position, only my personal thoughts.
I've
Legend!
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018, 11:29 Jean-Rémi PINNA wrote:
>
>
> Le ven. 7 sept. 2018 à 16:28, Sean Andrews
> a écrit :
>
>> Boom!
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 1:39 PM Catheryne Nicholson <
>> cather...@blockcypher.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I posted this announcement on the forum
>
Sorry, last bullet point should be:
• It incentivizes pooled mining, since *users* will probably only
submit transactions to the top N accelerators, if you're not in the
top N pools, you're incentivized to join one to maximize your fees
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 8:21 PM, Casey Rodar
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 11:59 AM, Fernando Nieto wrote:
> Once blocks are full, even if you only burn part of the fees, what makes
> you think users will publish transactions with a fee greater than
> MIN_FEE, instead of sending a MIN_FEE transaction to a known miner and
> then splitting the rest
Congratulations to everyone who made this possible! This is way too
exciting ^^
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Ignotus Peverell <
igno.pever...@protonmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just a quick note to announce that testnet1 is out! It's still at the
> build-it-yourself stage and has a lot
t; https://images-platform.99static.com/cJHTT3eEYbE5gVh4d4KJEwN
> QoVI=/filters:quality(100)/99designs-contests-attachments/90
> /90324/attachment_90324326
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 12:57 AM Fola Adejumo
> wrote:
>
> Great contribution Casey, thank you,
>
t;
> However, I'm not sure I strongly like any of them, they look like a
> company logo and don't look like a currency. I prefer to err towards more a
> currency look and feel. If they could make it simpler with more of a
> currency look that would be much better.
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
>
>
>
>
Also, keep in mind that we have an opportunity for further tweaks in
the final round. If there's a logo but you don't like the color,
background, or would like a minor tweak, do note that in your
comments!
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 7:05 PM, Casey Rodarmor wrote:
> Hi all!
>
&
Hi all!
Derek and I are running a logo design contest on 99 designs for Grin.
The logo that wins the design contest isn't guaranteed to become
Grin's logo, but should produce one or more strong options.
There have been a total of 171 (!) submissions to the contest. I've
narrowed them down to 16,
One thing that John brought up which I think is good to remember that
supply inflation is not the same as price inflation. Even in the face
of supply inflation, high demand and increasing adoption can lead to
negative price inflation. (e.g. price of grin going up)
Bitcoin has had supply inflation
urce=g>
> p) 205-223-2607 <(205)%20223-2607> w) shanwalt.com
> <http://www.shanwalt.com> t) @dwaltchack
> <http://www.twitter.com/dwaltchack>
>
>
>
> On Nov 2, 2017, at 8:54 PM, Casey Rodarmor wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I was thinking about s
umo wrote:
>
> Thanks,
>
> I've attached another with the text font changed to Helvetica, which I think
> fits the potter theme a little better.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
>
>
>
> From: Amit Singh
> Sent: 01 November 2017 10:40
Hi All,
Thanks John for making the graphs!
The graph of monetary inflation for a constant supply coin concerns me
slightly.
Central banks managing stable fiat currencies generally target 0% to 4%
price inflation per year.
Upon entering the 12.5 bitcoin block reward era a little under 8 years
af
That's awesome! But at the same time totally terrifying >_<
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 1:22 AM 0xb100d <0...@protonmail.com> wrote:
> Someone posted a logo on reddit and it got me thinking. my attempt to make
> something, feedback appreciated.
> https://imgur.com/oo3L1M5
>
>
>
> --
> Mailing list: h
Hi Igno,
A hard fork where everyone has a lot of time to upgrade is much less
painful than one in which the new client is available for only a short
time before the new rules go into effect.
So, it might be nice to also commit to a lower bound on the lead time
that users will have to upgrade and
The code that checks the block reward of the initial blocks will always
need to be part of the grin codebase (and any other implementations of
grin, should there ever be any).
Because it will always have to be part of the codebase, it seems like extra
complexity for limited benefit.
Interested mi
Thanks for this list! I like quite a lot of them ^_^
I think my favorites are Nemo, Daymark, Mani, Grall, Nasik, and Petrichorum
(added the um). Mu would be great for the smallest unit.
This is like, bikeshedding the the nth degree, but it's fun.
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:46 AM 0xb100d <0...@prot
Whoops, I meant "We're talking about kindergarten-level civility here."
As in, be nice, don't eat glue, don't hit. Rules that anyone should be able
to follow.
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 8:44 PM Casey Rodarmor wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 8:24 PM perc
g is peachy right now because this group is (relatively)
> small... I'd recommend a foundation be formed, even informally to begin
> with to handle project decisions democratically. In the future a non-profit
> entity might be a good idea
> - The project needs a Code of Conduct (@Igno, do
I'll bite!
Naming
==
1. I think that MimbleWimble is more in the transaction type category,
instead of the blockchain type category.
Perhaps it's a silly distinction, but one of the things that I like so much
about Grin is that, if you squint a bit, it's just a good ol' blockchain in
terms
Hi All,
In a world where large quantum computers exist, then only perfectly binding
chains are of any use of all.
However, if a world where large quantum computers do not exist, then it
seems like perfectly hiding chains are preferable.
Barring undisclosed advances in quantum computing, we seem
22 matches
Mail list logo
