Alan Hourihane writes:
> On 03/06/13 18:36, Brian Paul wrote:
>> On 03/06/2013 11:23 AM, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>>> If the sampler object has been deleted on another context, an
>>> alternative context may reference the old sampler. So ensure the sampler
>>> object still exists.
>>
>> Alan, is thi
On 03/07/13 00:12, Brian Paul wrote:
On 03/06/2013 11:46 AM, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On 03/06/13 18:36, Brian Paul wrote:
On 03/06/2013 11:23 AM, Alan Hourihane wrote:
If the sampler object has been deleted on another context, an
alternative context may reference the old sampler. So ensure the
s
On 03/06/2013 11:46 AM, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On 03/06/13 18:36, Brian Paul wrote:
On 03/06/2013 11:23 AM, Alan Hourihane wrote:
If the sampler object has been deleted on another context, an
alternative context may reference the old sampler. So ensure the
sampler
object still exists.
Alan, is
On 03/06/13 18:36, Brian Paul wrote:
On 03/06/2013 11:23 AM, Alan Hourihane wrote:
If the sampler object has been deleted on another context, an
alternative context may reference the old sampler. So ensure the sampler
object still exists.
Alan, is this specified somewhere in a spec? I can't f
On 03/06/2013 11:23 AM, Alan Hourihane wrote:
If the sampler object has been deleted on another context, an
alternative context may reference the old sampler. So ensure the sampler
object still exists.
Alan, is this specified somewhere in a spec? I can't find a
description of this behaviour a
