On 02/22/2016 08:23 PM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
On Monday, February 22, 2016 12:25:45 PM PST Tapani Pälli wrote:
On 02/22/2016 11:41 AM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
On Monday, February 22, 2016 8:06:35 AM PST Tapani Pälli wrote:
Hi Marek;
Was this commit fixing some issues/problems? Why would we
On 02/22/2016 04:48 AM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
>
> On 02/22/2016 02:27 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Tapani Pälli
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02/22/2016 02:01 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Tapani Pälli
wrote:
>
> Hi Marek;
>
On Monday, February 22, 2016 2:48:01 PM PST Tapani Pälli wrote:
>
> On 02/22/2016 02:27 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Tapani Pälli
wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 02/22/2016 02:01 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Tapani Pälli
> >>> wrote
On Monday, February 22, 2016 12:25:45 PM PST Tapani Pälli wrote:
>
> On 02/22/2016 11:41 AM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> > On Monday, February 22, 2016 8:06:35 AM PST Tapani Pälli wrote:
> >> Hi Marek;
> >>
> >> Was this commit fixing some issues/problems? Why would we not expose
> >> configs with ac
On 02/22/2016 03:01 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
On 02/22/2016 02:27 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Tapani Pälli
wrote:
On 02/22/2016 02:01 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Tapani Pälli
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
>
> On 02/22/2016 02:27 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Tapani Pälli
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02/22/2016 02:01 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Tapani Pälli
wrote:
>>
On 02/22/2016 02:27 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
On 02/22/2016 02:01 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Tapani Pälli
wrote:
Hi Marek;
Was this commit fixing some issues/problems? Why would we not expose
configs
with ac
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
>
>
> On 02/22/2016 02:01 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Tapani Pälli
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Marek;
>>>
>>> Was this commit fixing some issues/problems? Why would we not expose
>>> configs
>>> with accumulation buff
On 02/22/2016 02:01 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
Hi Marek;
Was this commit fixing some issues/problems? Why would we not expose configs
with accumulation buffer?
EGL doesn't support accumulation buffers.
So EGL would not expose such capabil
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
> Hi Marek;
>
> Was this commit fixing some issues/problems? Why would we not expose configs
> with accumulation buffer?
EGL doesn't support accumulation buffers.
Marek
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa
On 02/22/2016 11:41 AM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
On Monday, February 22, 2016 8:06:35 AM PST Tapani Pälli wrote:
Hi Marek;
Was this commit fixing some issues/problems? Why would we not expose
configs with accumulation buffer?
--- 8< ---
commit 396cbabbefaae64deac6d33c79898bb07db8a621
Author: Ma
On Monday, February 22, 2016 8:06:35 AM PST Tapani Pälli wrote:
> Hi Marek;
>
> Was this commit fixing some issues/problems? Why would we not expose
> configs with accumulation buffer?
>
> --- 8< ---
> commit 396cbabbefaae64deac6d33c79898bb07db8a621
> Author: Marek Olšák
> Date: Thu Apr 9 23:
Hi Marek;
Was this commit fixing some issues/problems? Why would we not expose
configs with accumulation buffer?
--- 8< ---
commit 396cbabbefaae64deac6d33c79898bb07db8a621
Author: Marek Olšák
Date: Thu Apr 9 23:25:07 2015 +0200
egl/dri: don't expose configs with an accumulation buffer
13 matches
Mail list logo