On Monday, February 22, 2016 8:06:35 AM PST Tapani Pälli wrote: > Hi Marek; > > Was this commit fixing some issues/problems? Why would we not expose > configs with accumulation buffer? > > --- 8< --- > commit 396cbabbefaae64deac6d33c79898bb07db8a621 > Author: Marek Olšák <marek.ol...@amd.com> > Date: Thu Apr 9 23:25:07 2015 +0200 > > egl/dri: don't expose configs with an accumulation buffer > --- 8< --- > > Thanks; > > // Tapani
Assuming it's legal not to expose them, it would certainly be nice. Accumulation buffers only exist in legacy GL (neither core profile nor GLES have ever had them), and our GLX implementation has marked them as "SLOW" for at least 12 years. I don't recall the details, but I think it was some awful software fallback. At any rate, I've never seen an application use them. --Ken
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
