2011/7/12 Christian König :
> Am Dienstag, den 12.07.2011, 15:44 +0200 schrieb Henri Verbeet:
>> 2011/7/12 Christian König :
>> > + // TODO get BLEND_CLAMP state from rasterizer state
>> Is this comment still accurate?
> Yes it is, the very first generation of R600 chipsets need to know i
Am Dienstag, den 12.07.2011, 15:44 +0200 schrieb Henri Verbeet:
> 2011/7/12 Christian König :
> > it works with my available hardware (no piglit regressions). The changes
> > to the winsys code is about making a bo optional, even when the reg
> > informations says it isn't. This is useful for regis
- Original Message -
> Hi guys,
>
> as the subject already indicates: I'm about to merge pipe-video to
> master and just wanted to ask if anybody has still any objections?
>
> After following Jose and Younes discussion on mesa-dev about how to
> design such an abstraction layer I took a
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 11:13 -0400, Younes Manton wrote:
> 2011/7/12 Keith Whitwell :
> > I'm a bit unsure about what's the best approach here, though at this
> > stage I'm happy with your approach and don't think it needs to be
> > changed before any merge.
> >
> > But speaking in general terms, in
2011/7/12 Keith Whitwell :
> I'm a bit unsure about what's the best approach here, though at this
> stage I'm happy with your approach and don't think it needs to be
> changed before any merge.
>
> But speaking in general terms, individual planes map well onto 8-bit
> single-component texture image
2011/7/12 Christian König :
> it works with my available hardware (no piglit regressions). The changes
> to the winsys code is about making a bo optional, even when the reg
> informations says it isn't. This is useful for registers where only a
> subset of the bits needs to be informed about a bo r
Am Dienstag, den 12.07.2011, 13:06 +0200 schrieb Henri Verbeet:
> 2011/7/11 Christian König :
> > So what do you guys think about it?
> >
> I didn't look much at the rest of the changes, but some of the changes
> for r600g (diff attached) look a bit questionable. Could you take a
> look at those to
Hi,
> >as the subject already indicates: I'm about to merge pipe-video to
> >master and just wanted to ask if anybody has still any objections?
> >
>
> Yes [I am a watchman of compile/build errors (I know I am an old bitcher but
> code quality rules)]:
>
> https://build.opensuse.org/package/raw
2011/7/11 Christian König :
> So what do you guys think about it?
>
I didn't look much at the rest of the changes, but some of the changes
for r600g (diff attached) look a bit questionable. Could you take a
look at those to see if they're really all intentional and correct
before merging?
r600g.d
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 18:24 +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> as the subject already indicates: I'm about to merge pipe-video to
> master and just wanted to ask if anybody has still any objections?
>
> After following Jose and Younes discussion on mesa-dev about how to
> design such an
Christian König schrieb:
>Hi guys,
>
>as the subject already indicates: I'm about to merge pipe-video to
>master and just wanted to ask if anybody has still any objections?
>
Yes [I am a watchman of compile/build errors (I know I am an old bitcher but
code quality rules)]:
https://build.opensuse
Hi guys,
as the subject already indicates: I'm about to merge pipe-video to
master and just wanted to ask if anybody has still any objections?
After following Jose and Younes discussion on mesa-dev about how to
design such an abstraction layer I took another round of cleaning up the
interface and
12 matches
Mail list logo
