On Fre, 2012-09-14 at 09:41 +0300, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 09/13/2012 09:48 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Mit, 2012-09-12 at 22:45 +0200, Andreas Boll wrote:
> >>
> >> I think we should probably cherry-pick almost all of the radeonsi
> >> fixes from master, because it's a pretty new experimental
On 09/12/2012 11:45 PM, Andreas Boll wrote:
Hi list,
I've cherry-picked some commits for the 9.0 branch.
I've done a piglit (1d05317) quick-driver run with r600g on my rv770
without any regressions.
Could someone pull from my branch and push the patches to the 9.0 branch?
I did a quick piglit
On 09/13/2012 09:48 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mit, 2012-09-12 at 22:45 +0200, Andreas Boll wrote:
I think we should probably cherry-pick almost all of the radeonsi
fixes from master, because it's a pretty new experimental driver which
was introduced during 9.0 development cycle.
Shouldn't we?
On Mit, 2012-09-12 at 22:45 +0200, Andreas Boll wrote:
>
> I think we should probably cherry-pick almost all of the radeonsi
> fixes from master, because it's a pretty new experimental driver which
> was introduced during 9.0 development cycle.
> Shouldn't we?
We probably should at some point,
Hi list,
I've cherry-picked some commits for the 9.0 branch.
I've done a piglit (1d05317) quick-driver run with r600g on my rv770
without any regressions.
Could someone pull from my branch and push the patches to the 9.0 branch?
I think we should probably cherry-pick almost all of the radeonsi
fi
