Tomasz,
> -Original Message-
> From: Tomasz Figa [mailto:tf...@chromium.org]
> Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 5:29 PM
> To: Marathe, Yogesh
> Hi Yogesh,
>
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Marathe, Yogesh
> wrote:
> > Hi Tomasz,
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: mesa-dev
Hi Yogesh,
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Marathe, Yogesh
wrote:
> Hi Tomasz,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: mesa-dev [mailto:mesa-dev-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf
>> Of Tomasz Figa
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2017 7:45 AM
>> To: Marathe, Yogesh
>> >> > >> Changing the to
Hi Tomasz,
> -Original Message-
> From: mesa-dev [mailto:mesa-dev-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf
> Of Tomasz Figa
> Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2017 7:45 AM
> To: Marathe, Yogesh
> >> > >> Changing the topic, the patch doesn't seem to change the
> >> > >> implementation of swapBuf
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Marathe, Yogesh
wrote:
> Tomasz,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: mesa-dev [mailto:mesa-dev-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf
>> Of Tomasz Figa
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2017 7:43 AM
>> To: Marathe, Yogesh
>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Marathe
Tomasz,
> -Original Message-
> From: mesa-dev [mailto:mesa-dev-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf
> Of Tomasz Figa
> Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2017 7:43 AM
> To: Marathe, Yogesh
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Marathe, Yogesh
> wrote:
> > Tomasz,
> >
> >> -Original Message
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Marathe, Yogesh
wrote:
> Tomasz,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Tomasz Figa [mailto:tf...@chromium.org]
>> Sent: Saturday, August 5, 2017 8:47 AM
>>
>> Hi Yogesh,
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 1:22 AM, Marathe, Yogesh
>> wrote:
>> >> -Original Message-
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Marathe, Yogesh
wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>>
>> Tomasz,
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Tomasz Figa [mailto:tf...@chromium.org]
>> > Sent: Saturday, August 5, 2017 8:47 AM
>> >
>> > Hi Yogesh,
>> >
>> > On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 1:22 AM, Marath
> -Original Message-
>
> Tomasz,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tomasz Figa [mailto:tf...@chromium.org]
> > Sent: Saturday, August 5, 2017 8:47 AM
> >
> > Hi Yogesh,
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 1:22 AM, Marathe, Yogesh
> >
> > wrote:
> > >> -Original Message-
> > >
Tomasz,
> -Original Message-
> From: Tomasz Figa [mailto:tf...@chromium.org]
> Sent: Saturday, August 5, 2017 8:47 AM
>
> Hi Yogesh,
>
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 1:22 AM, Marathe, Yogesh
> wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Tomasz Figa [mailto:tf...@chromium.org]
> >> Sent:
Hi Yogesh,
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 1:22 AM, Marathe, Yogesh
wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Tomasz Figa [mailto:tf...@chromium.org]
>> Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 9:39 PM
>> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 12:53 AM, Marathe, Yogesh
>> wrote:
>> > Tomasz, Emil,
>> >
>> >> -Original Messa
On 4 August 2017 at 14:23, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>
> If this needs so complicated series of checks, maybe it would make
> more sense to just set enable_out_fence based on availability of the
> capability at initialization time?
>
Either way is fine with me.
>> Did you drop it all together or change
> -Original Message-
> From: Tomasz Figa [mailto:tf...@chromium.org]
> Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 9:39 PM
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 12:53 AM, Marathe, Yogesh
> wrote:
> > Tomasz, Emil,
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Tomasz Figa [mailto:tf...@chromium.org]
> >> On Fri, Aug
ognolli, Rafael
>> ; ML mesa-dev > d...@lists.freedesktop.org>; Wu, Zhongmin ; Gao,
>> Shuo ; Liu, Zhiquan ; Daniel
>> Stone ; Timothy Arceri ; Eric
>> Engestrom ; Kenneth Graunke ;
>> Kondapally, Kalyan ; Varad Gautam
>> ; Rainer Hochecker ;
>> Nicolai Hähnle
>>
Zhiquan ; Daniel
> Stone ; Timothy Arceri ; Eric
> Engestrom ; Kenneth Graunke ;
> Kondapally, Kalyan ; Varad Gautam
> ; Rainer Hochecker ;
> Nicolai Hähnle
> Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] i965: Queue the buffer with a sync
> fence
> for Android OS
>
&g
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 9:55 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>> >> - version check (2+) the fence extension, calling .create_fence_fd()
>>> >> only when
>>> >> .get_capabilities() advertises __DRI_FENCE_CAP_NATIVE_FD
>>
>> The check looks like below now, this is in dri2_surf_update_fence_fd()
>> before
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Marathe, Yogesh
wrote:
>> >> >> - version check (2+) the fence extension, calling
>> >> >> .create_fence_fd() only when
>> >> >> .get_capabilities() advertises __DRI_FENCE_CAP_NATIVE_FD
>> >
>> > The check looks like below now, this is in dri2_surf_update_fence_fd
On 4 August 2017 at 04:21, Marathe, Yogesh wrote:
>> > The check looks like below now, this is in dri2_surf_update_fence_fd()
>> > before
>> create_fence_fd is called.
>> >
>> > if (dri2_surf->enable_out_fence && dri2_dpy->fence) {
>> >if(__DRI_FENCE_CAP_NATIVE_FD |
>> > dri2_dpy->fence-
>> To: Marathe, Yogesh
>> Cc: Emil Velikov ; Antognolli, Rafael
>> ; ML mesa-dev > d...@lists.freedesktop.org>; Wu, Zhongmin
>> Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] i965: Queue the buffer with a sync
>> fence
>> for Android OS
>
t; ; Wu, Zhongmin ; Kenneth
> Graunke ; Kondapally, Kalyan
> ; Rainer Hochecker ;
> ML mesa-dev ; Timothy Arceri
> ; Varad Gautam
> Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] i965: Queue the buffer with a sync
> fence
> for Android OS
>
> Hi Yogesh,
>
> On Fri, Aug 4,
, August 3, 2017 7:19 PM
>> To: Marathe, Yogesh
>> Cc: Emil Velikov ; Antognolli, Rafael
>> ; ML mesa-dev > d...@lists.freedesktop.org>; Wu, Zhongmin
>> Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] i965: Queue the buffer with a sync
>> fence
>> for Android OS
>
; ; ML mesa-dev d...@lists.freedesktop.org>; Wu, Zhongmin
> Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] i965: Queue the buffer with a sync
> fence
> for Android OS
>
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 10:11 PM, Marathe, Yogesh
> wrote:
> > Emil,
> >
> >> -Origi
>> Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] i965: Queue the buffer with a sync
>> fence
>> for Android OS
>>
>> On 2 August 2017 at 20:01, wrote:
>> > From: Zhongmin Wu
>> >
>> > Before we queued the buffer with a invalid fence (-1), i
Emil,
> -Original Message-
> From: Emil Velikov [mailto:emil.l.veli...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 4:06 PM
> To: Marathe, Yogesh
> Cc: ML mesa-dev ; Wu, Zhongmin
>
> Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] i965: Queue the buffer with a sync
>
On 2 August 2017 at 20:01, wrote:
> From: Zhongmin Wu
>
> Before we queued the buffer with a invalid fence (-1), it causes
> benchmarks such as flatland to fail. This patch enables explicit
> sync feature on android.
>
> Now we get the out fence during the flushing buffer and then pass
> it to S
From: Zhongmin Wu
Before we queued the buffer with a invalid fence (-1), it causes
benchmarks such as flatland to fail. This patch enables explicit
sync feature on android.
Now we get the out fence during the flushing buffer and then pass
it to SurfaceFlinger in eglSwapbuffer function.
v2: a) A
25 matches
Mail list logo
