Good morning,
On Wednesday, 3 April 2019 16:51:03 CEST Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 10:13 AM Mathias Fröhlich
> wrote:
>
> > > What is missing for merging this?
> >
> > I saw the pbuffer swrast crash and proposed to disable them via the
> > 3rd patch that I pushed into my branch f
On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 15:51, Marek Olšák wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 10:13 AM Mathias Fröhlich
> wrote:
>>
>> > What is missing for merging this?
>>
>> I saw the pbuffer swrast crash and proposed to disable them via the
>> 3rd patch that I pushed into my branch for you.
>> Emil never respo
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 10:13 AM Mathias Fröhlich
wrote:
> > What is missing for merging this?
>
> I saw the pbuffer swrast crash and proposed to disable them via the
> 3rd patch that I pushed into my branch for you.
> Emil never responded to that proposal directly. In one mail he mentioned
> that
> What is missing for merging this?
I saw the pbuffer swrast crash and proposed to disable them via the
3rd patch that I pushed into my branch for you.
Emil never responded to that proposal directly. In one mail he mentioned
that he wanted to care for swrast to cope with the pbuffers. So I hoped t
What is missing for merging this?
Thanks,
Marek
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 12:30 AM Mathias Fröhlich
wrote:
> Marek,
>
> On Tuesday, 2 April 2019 23:07:50 CEST Marek Olšák wrote:
> > Do you have a branch with patch 7/8 and 8/8? I'm interested in
> > EGL_EXT_platform_device on radeonsi.
>
> You can
Marek,
On Tuesday, 2 April 2019 23:07:50 CEST Marek Olšák wrote:
> Do you have a branch with patch 7/8 and 8/8? I'm interested in
> EGL_EXT_platform_device on radeonsi.
You can take a look at the egl-device-4 branch on
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/frohlich/mesa.git
I pushed a rebased and slight
Do you have a branch with patch 7/8 and 8/8? I'm interested in
EGL_EXT_platform_device on radeonsi.
Thanks,
Marek
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 4:36 AM Mathias Fröhlich
wrote:
> Hi Emil,
>
> Ok, thanks for picking that up.
>
> On Tuesday, 2 October 2018 12:23:30 CEST Emil Velikov wrote:
> > On Thu, 20
Hi Emil,
Ok, thanks for picking that up.
On Tuesday, 2 October 2018 12:23:30 CEST Emil Velikov wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 at 15:13, Mathias Fröhlich
> wrote:
>
> >
> > If I replace the above with
> >
> > EGLint surface_type = 0;
> > /* Only advertise pbuffer configs for non
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 at 15:13, Mathias Fröhlich
wrote:
>
> If I replace the above with
>
> EGLint surface_type = 0;
> /* Only advertise pbuffer configs for non swrast devices */
> if (dri2_dpy->image_driver)
> surface_type = EGL_PBUFFER_BIT;
>
> dri2
Hi Emil,
some comments below:
On Tuesday, 4 September 2018 20:33:05 CEST Emil Velikov wrote:
> From: Emil Velikov
>
> This new 'platform' is added by default with no guards.
>
> It is effectively a copy of the surfaceless one, with updated function
> names and brand new probe function.
>
> Du
From: Emil Velikov
This new 'platform' is added by default with no guards.
It is effectively a copy of the surfaceless one, with updated function
names and brand new probe function.
Due to the reuse, some of the ifdef HAVE_SURFACELESS_PLATFORM guards
have been dropped.
A worthy mention are the
11 matches
Mail list logo
