Good morning, On Wednesday, 3 April 2019 16:51:03 CEST Marek Olšák wrote: > On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 10:13 AM Mathias Fröhlich <mathias.froehl...@gmx.net> > wrote: > > > > What is missing for merging this? > > > > I saw the pbuffer swrast crash and proposed to disable them via the > > 3rd patch that I pushed into my branch for you. > > Emil never responded to that proposal directly. In one mail he mentioned > > that he wanted to care for swrast to cope with the pbuffers. So I hoped > > that > > he continues the work he mentioned... > > > > For me it would be ok to squash patch #2 and #3 into one and for now > > disable pbuffers on swrast from device. > > > > What I don't want to have is mesa crashing on the egl pbuffer on a swrast > > device as crashing is not an option. > > > > Sounds reasonable. So you basically said that the branch is ready to be > merged, right?
Hmm, Emil sent a new series. I spent the day to plug together all the use cases that should be tested finally. I just sent that to the piglit list. With that I hope not to mention anymore /some/ test cases here around that you don't know. An may be you both take a look at the test so that we can continuously test these code paths. I will take a look at Emils changes as my branch only got rebased to keep it compiling. I am not sure my branch still works sufficiently. > I'm being pressured to get EGL_EXT_platform_device into master ASAP. Which I completely understand. The feature is really a killer feature for the CAE industry! best Mathias _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
