On Monday, November 7, 2016 2:22:56 PM PST Francisco Jerez wrote:
> Chris Forbes writes:
>
> > Hi Curro,
> >
> > Thanks for being thorough about this -- I think there is still one area
> > where things might be a bit wobbly; if we end up taking a sw fallback,
> > swrast only does 4 bits. I'm not
Chris Forbes writes:
> Hi Curro,
>
> Thanks for being thorough about this -- I think there is still one area
> where things might be a bit wobbly; if we end up taking a sw fallback,
> swrast only does 4 bits. I'm not sure that matters though.
>
Hmm, I don't think we fall back to swrast for anythi
Chris Forbes writes:
> The mesa default is 4, but we program the hardware for 8 on all
> generations.
>
I happened to come across this inconsistency a couple of weeks ago -- I
just double-checked that it doesn't cause any conformance regressions
because some of the rasterization tests use the GL
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Chris Forbes wrote:
> The mesa default is 4, but we program the hardware for 8 on all
> generations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Forbes
> ---
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_context.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i96
The mesa default is 4, but we program the hardware for 8 on all
generations.
Signed-off-by: Chris Forbes
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_context.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_context.c
b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_context.c
index 3085a9
