On 04/29/2013 06:20 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
Kenneth Graunke writes:
On 04/23/2013 04:56 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
While this doesn't have the detail that the FS scheduler does, and is
ignorant of dependency control, it's still good for a 0.60% +/- 0.15%
performance improvement on GLBenchmark 2.7
Kenneth Graunke writes:
> On 04/23/2013 04:56 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> While this doesn't have the detail that the FS scheduler does, and is
>> ignorant of dependency control, it's still good for a 0.60% +/- 0.15%
>> performance improvement on GLBenchmark 2.7 (n=45/47, outliers removed)
>> ---
>
On 04/23/2013 04:56 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
While this doesn't have the detail that the FS scheduler does, and is
ignorant of dependency control, it's still good for a 0.60% +/- 0.15%
performance improvement on GLBenchmark 2.7 (n=45/47, outliers removed)
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/Makefile.so
While this doesn't have the detail that the FS scheduler does, and is
ignorant of dependency control, it's still good for a 0.60% +/- 0.15%
performance improvement on GLBenchmark 2.7 (n=45/47, outliers removed)
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/Makefile.sources |1 +
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i
While this doesn't have the detail that the FS scheduler does, and is
ignorant of dependency control, it's still good for a 0.60% +/- 0.15%
performance improvement on GLBenchmark 2.7 (n=45/47, outliers removed)
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/Makefile.sources |1 +
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i
