On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 01:09:25PM -0700, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> These look great! I've gone ahead and pushed them with a few tiny changes:
>
> 1. I updated a comment in patch 2, which still said the hash_table
> mapped using variable names/strings.
> 2. I changed the for (exec_node ...) loop
On 05/02/2012 02:11 PM, Olivier Galibert wrote:
Hello,
Here is the second version of that patch series. It's fundamentally
the same thing with a number of changes:
- respect the coding style a little better
- index the hash table on the variable object pointer and not the name
- handle funct
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 11:11:36PM +0200, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> What's missing is a piglit run, which I currently have technical
> problems with.
Thanks to very pertinent advice by ajax and anholt I've been able to
do a piglit run. With three additional bugfix patches I've sent
independently
Hello,
Here is the second version of that patch series. It's fundamentally
the same thing with a number of changes:
- respect the coding style a little better
- index the hash table on the variable object pointer and not the name
- handle function call in function call (tested with atan(a))
- h
