On Jul 23, 2018 22:05, Dave Airlie wrote:On 20 July 2018 at 13:39, Gurchetan Singh wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Gurchetan Singh
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 4:06 AM Erik Faye-Lund
> wrote:
>>
>> The IOCTLs doesn't pass this along, so computing them in the first
>> place is kinda pointless.
>>
>>
On 20 July 2018 at 13:39, Gurchetan Singh wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Gurchetan Singh
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 4:06 AM Erik Faye-Lund
> wrote:
>>
>> The IOCTLs doesn't pass this along, so computing them in the first
>> place is kinda pointless.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund
>> ---
>>
>> This i
Reviewed-by: Gurchetan Singh
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 4:06 AM Erik Faye-Lund
wrote:
>
> The IOCTLs doesn't pass this along, so computing them in the first
> place is kinda pointless.
>
> Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund
> ---
>
> This is just a cleanup I noticed based on some discussion with Gert.
>
The IOCTLs doesn't pass this along, so computing them in the first
place is kinda pointless.
Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund
---
This is just a cleanup I noticed based on some discussion with Gert.
A question is, what code here expects this stride to be respected? The
call-sites in virgl_*_transf