On 20 March 2018 at 16:15, Brian Paul wrote:
> On 03/20/2018 05:41 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>
>> From: Emil Velikov
>>
>> Stay consistent with the rest of the codebase, effectively fixing the
>> autotools build.
>>
>> Bugzilla:
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.freedesk
On 03/20/2018 05:41 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
From: Emil Velikov
Stay consistent with the rest of the codebase, effectively fixing the
autotools build.
Bugzilla:
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bugs.freedesktop.org_show-5Fbug.cgi-3Fid-3D105621&d=DwIGaQ&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNX
On 20 March 2018 at 12:14, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> is compiler/nir/nir.h the preferred way?
>
> I checked src/amd and we are using "nir/nir.h" all the time.
>
Consistency within the subsystem is the key. Currently different
subsystems have varying choices - language, formatting, coding
style,..
is compiler/nir/nir.h the preferred way?
I checked src/amd and we are using "nir/nir.h" all the time.
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 12:41 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> From: Emil Velikov
>
> Stay consistent with the rest of the codebase, effectively fixing the
> autotools build.
>
> Bugzilla: https://bug
From: Emil Velikov
Stay consistent with the rest of the codebase, effectively fixing the
autotools build.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105621
Fixes: ffa4bbe4665 ("st/nir/radeonsi: move nir_lower_uniforms_to_ubo()
to the state tracker")
Cc: Timothy Arceri
Signed-off-by:
