is compiler/nir/nir.h the preferred way? I checked src/amd and we are using "nir/nir.h" all the time.
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 12:41 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Emil Velikov <emil.veli...@collabora.com> > > Stay consistent with the rest of the codebase, effectively fixing the > autotools build. > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105621 > Fixes: ffa4bbe4665 ("st/nir/radeonsi: move nir_lower_uniforms_to_ubo() > to the state tracker") > Cc: Timothy Arceri <tarc...@itsqueeze.com> > Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.veli...@collabora.com> > --- > src/mesa/state_tracker/st_nir_lower_uniforms_to_ubo.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_nir_lower_uniforms_to_ubo.c > b/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_nir_lower_uniforms_to_ubo.c > index e2a477ecc74..b2f8f833bbb 100644 > --- a/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_nir_lower_uniforms_to_ubo.c > +++ b/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_nir_lower_uniforms_to_ubo.c > @@ -29,8 +29,8 @@ > * point by 1. > */ > > -#include "nir.h" > -#include "nir_builder.h" > +#include "compiler/nir/nir.h" > +#include "compiler/nir/nir_builder.h" > #include "st_nir.h" > > #include "program/prog_parameter.h" > -- > 2.16.0 > > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
