> On Mar 23, 2016, at 2:19 PM, Tom Stellard wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 04:53:29PM +, Rowley, Timothy O wrote:
>>
>> While that situation would be nice, the swr rasterizer is a subset of an
>> internal project, and what is upstreamed publicly is not just a straight
>> copy of our r
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 04:53:29PM +, Rowley, Timothy O wrote:
>
> > On Mar 23, 2016, at 12:52 AM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> >
> > That's an awkward situation we've not run into before.
> >
> > If the code is going to live in the upstream Mesa git repository, then
> > it seems like the best
> On Mar 23, 2016, at 12:52 AM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
>
> That's an awkward situation we've not run into before.
>
> If the code is going to live in the upstream Mesa git repository, then
> it seems like the best long term plan is to reverse the workflow: make
> upstream Mesa the canonical rep
> On Mar 23, 2016, at 12:52 AM, Justen, Jordan L
> wrote:
>
> On 2016-03-22 20:55:10, Rowley, Timothy O wrote:
>>
>> Yes, there’s a lot in this patch. I froze the public version of the
>> rasterizer when I began the upstreaming process mid February, so
>> this is syncing up with about a month’
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Rowley, Timothy O
wrote:
>
>> On Mar 22, 2016, at 3:51 PM, Justen, Jordan L
>> wrote:
>>
>> What does 532172 in the subject refer to?
>
> swr rasterizer development happens in another source control system. 532172
> is a revision id to checkpoint where we’ve pu
On Wednesday, March 23, 2016 3:55:10 AM PDT Rowley, Timothy O wrote:
>
> > On Mar 22, 2016, at 3:51 PM, Justen, Jordan L
wrote:
> >
> > What does 532172 in the subject refer to?
>
> swr rasterizer development happens in another source control system. 532172
is a revision id to checkpoint whe
On 2016-03-22 20:55:10, Rowley, Timothy O wrote:
>
> > On Mar 22, 2016, at 3:51 PM, Justen, Jordan L
> > wrote:
> >
> > What does 532172 in the subject refer to?
>
> swr rasterizer development happens in another source control system.
> 532172 is a revision id to checkpoint where we’ve pushed
> On Mar 22, 2016, at 3:51 PM, Justen, Jordan L
> wrote:
>
> What does 532172 in the subject refer to?
swr rasterizer development happens in another source control system. 532172 is
a revision id to checkpoint where we’ve pushed the changes publicly.
> From this commit message, it seems cle
What does 532172 in the subject refer to?
On 2016-03-22 12:45:48, Tim Rowley wrote:
> Highlights include:
> * code style fixes
> * start removing win32 types
> * switch DC/DS rings to ringbuffer datastructure
> * rdtsc bucket support for shaders
> * address some coverity issues
> * use
