On Wednesday, March 23, 2016 3:55:10 AM PDT Rowley, Timothy O wrote: > > > On Mar 22, 2016, at 3:51 PM, Justen, Jordan L <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com> wrote: > > > > What does 532172 in the subject refer to? > > swr rasterizer development happens in another source control system. 532172 is a revision id to checkpoint where we’ve pushed the changes publicly.
That's an awkward situation we've not run into before. If the code is going to live in the upstream Mesa git repository, then it seems like the best long term plan is to reverse the workflow: make upstream Mesa the canonical repository, do development upstream, and pull changes from upstream into any internal repositories. Obviously, that's a huge process change - presumably you have a bunch of people working in some Intel perforce system - but working in the public is very beneficial. It's also the mark of a true open source project, rather than simply "available source". I don't know how much control you have over this, though...?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
