Am 17.12.2015 um 20:22 schrieb Matt Turner:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Roland Scheidegger
> wrote:
>> Am 17.12.2015 um 19:13 schrieb Brian Paul:
>>> On 12/17/2015 09:58 AM, srol...@vmware.com wrote:
From: Roland Scheidegger
NaNs mean it should be clipped, otherwise the Na
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> Am 17.12.2015 um 19:13 schrieb Brian Paul:
>> On 12/17/2015 09:58 AM, srol...@vmware.com wrote:
>>> From: Roland Scheidegger
>>>
>>> NaNs mean it should be clipped, otherwise the NaNs might get passed to
>>> the
>>> next stages (if cli
Am 17.12.2015 um 19:13 schrieb Brian Paul:
> On 12/17/2015 09:58 AM, srol...@vmware.com wrote:
>> From: Roland Scheidegger
>>
>> NaNs mean it should be clipped, otherwise the NaNs might get passed to
>> the
>> next stages (if clipping didn't happen for another reason already), which
>> might cause
On 12/17/2015 09:58 AM, srol...@vmware.com wrote:
From: Roland Scheidegger
NaNs mean it should be clipped, otherwise the NaNs might get passed to the
next stages (if clipping didn't happen for another reason already), which
might cause all kind of problems.
The llvm path got this right already
From: Roland Scheidegger
NaNs mean it should be clipped, otherwise the NaNs might get passed to the
next stages (if clipping didn't happen for another reason already), which
might cause all kind of problems.
The llvm path got this right already (possibly by luck), but this isn't used
when there's
