Hi Jordan,
thanks for the pointer, we will start working on the NIR bits in that
case.
Iago
On Fri, 2015-05-15 at 17:27 -0700, Jordan Justen wrote:
> On 2015-05-14 07:06:03, Iago Toral Quiroga wrote:
> > Notice that NIR is not supported yet, so anyone wanting to test this on
> > i965 needs to se
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90497
--- Comment #1 from Michel Dänzer ---
I think this happens when using a new version of *_dri.so with an old version
of libglapi.so.0. Make sure the latter is from the same version of Mesa as the
former.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
Hm, oops. But I guess my tess patchset will take care of this. I guess
it's a side-effect of adding to the gallium enums.
Marek, you ended up pushing those gallium patches out... I was going
to wait until the branchpoint was done. Should we just fix up the
drivers as necessary, or fix up st_destro
GK110/GK208 have 256 registers, not 64. Find out the number of registers
from the target (which will report 255/63 as the last reg is hard-wired
to 0).
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin
---
.../drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_emit_nvc0.cpp | 17 ++---
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+),
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin
---
Just happened to notice it... still not the leak I'm chasing :( The
only time this can happen is basically when it's unhappy about the
clip distance usage (i.e. clipvertex + clipdistance at the same time).
src/glsl/linker.cpp | 10 --
1 file changed, 8 ins
On Sunday, May 17, 2015 09:34:30 AM Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 16/05/15 17:11, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > There was some discussion on IRC today about what the official date
> > is. A bunch of Intel people have been working under the assumption
> > that it's the end of next week, not this week.
> Wha
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> On Sunday, May 17, 2015 05:32:24 PM Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin
>> ---
>> src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.c
On Sunday, May 17, 2015 05:32:24 PM Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin
> ---
> src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp
> b/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp
> index 74c19
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin
---
src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp
b/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp
index 74c1932..0c582f5 100644
--- a/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp
+++
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90497
Bug ID: 90497
Summary: link: /usr/lib64/dri/i965_dri.so: undefined symbol:
_glapi_set_nop_handler
Product: Mesa
Version: git
Hardware: Other
OS: All
don't suppose anyone ever wrote one that we could reuse for softpipe?
Dave.
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
2015-05-16 2:46 GMT+08:00 Ilia Mirkin :
> Please elaborate why this is necessary. I have, in the past, had
> requests to move to the C++11 std::unordered_set -- would that work
> for you? I'd be happy with a #if c++11 is available, use
> std::unordered_set. Otherwise use std::tr1::unordered_set.
H
Reviewed-by: Tobias Klausmann
On 17.05.2015 18:21, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset
---
src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/Makefile.sources| 1 +
src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nvc0/nvc0_context.h | 12 +--
src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nvc0/nvc0_query.c | 28 ++
Reviewed-by: Tobias Klausmann
On 17.05.2015 18:19, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset
---
src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/Makefile.sources| 1 +
src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/nv50_context.h | 12 +---
src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/nv50_query.c | 21 +
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset
---
src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nvc0/nvc0_query.c | 21 -
src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nvc0/nvc0_query.h | 3 ---
src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nvc0/nvc0_state.c | 19 +++
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --g
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset
---
src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/Makefile.sources| 1 +
src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nvc0/nvc0_context.h | 12 +--
src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nvc0/nvc0_query.c | 28 ++-
src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nvc0/nvc0_query.h | 47 +
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset
---
src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/Makefile.sources| 1 +
src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/nv50_context.h | 12 +---
src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/nv50_query.c | 21 +
src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/nv50_query.h | 41 ++
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset
---
src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/nv50_query.c | 18 --
src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/nv50_query.h | 3 ---
src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/nv50_state.c | 18 ++
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a
I'm also amending the diff below.
Marek
diff --git a/src/gallium/include/pipe/p_shader_tokens.h
b/src/gallium/include/pipe/p_shader_tokens.h
index 24cab94..953bdf6 100644
--- a/src/gallium/include/pipe/p_shader_tokens.h
+++ b/src/gallium/include/pipe/p_shader_tokens.h
@@ -538,10 +538,6 @@ struct
From: Marek Olšák
It's a remnant of some old NV extension. Unused.
I also have a patch that removes predicates if anyone is interested.
---
src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_tgsi_aos.c| 16 +--
src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_tgsi_soa.c| 21 +
src/gallium/auxiliary/n
This just created extra upkeep and the push to move extern
C's into mesa code would mean a large number of extern's
in core Mesa driver interfaces. The Haiku Gallium renderers
are mostly insulated via the C-based Haiku state tracker.
As any future hardware support in Haiku will be gallium
based, l
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90147
--- Comment #12 from Jon TURNEY ---
My patch is superseded by
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2015-May/084445.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
On 16/05/2015 05:12, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Ah yes, I see Jons patch now in
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90147#c9
That looks like it should work for Solaris too, so whichever the
Mesa developers prefer...
Alan's patch is clearly superior, so please apply.
On 16/05/15 17:11, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> There was some discussion on IRC today about what the official date
> is. A bunch of Intel people have been working under the assumption
> that it's the end of next week, not this week.
What would be the best way to minimise such confusion - more often em
24 matches
Mail list logo
