cc
Subject
his communication is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender.
"Charlie Downs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: meditech-l@mtusers.com
03/09/2007 02:55 PM
To
"Makara, Susan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
cc
Subject
Re: [MED
9, 2007 2:56 PM
To: Makara, Susan; meditech-l@MTUsers.com
Subject: Re: [MEDITECH-L] PHARMACY VERIFICATION
Susan - Another case of " working as designed". Meditech fails to acknowledge
that it is a poor design. This is one of the reasons that pharmacists enter all
of our orders; it is faster t
Susan,
I'm going to respectfully disagree. Speaking from Kansas regulations,
the technician could not make the "judgmental decision" of which order
is appropriate for the patient. Granted identical orders are easy but
many times they are not the same orders. It is the pharmacists that
should ma
PHARMACY VERIFICATIONSusan - Another case of " working as designed". Meditech
fails to acknowledge that it is a poor design. This is one of the reasons that
pharmacists enter all of our orders; it is faster than the verification process
and frees up a tech. Plus, we have a fairly high turnover r
