RE: [MEDITECH-L] Issues with new eMAR verbiage re: time variances

2007-06-01 Thread Bill Mullins
ech-l@MTUsers.com Subject: RE: [MEDITECH-L] Issues with new eMAR verbiage re: time variances The below is NOT a DTS. It is a rule that you need to set up in your rules dictionary. I have it working and it works well. Also, regarding the verbiage for the variance: we had a priority pack 7 for test for

RE: [MEDITECH-L] Issues with new eMAR verbiage re: time variances

2007-06-01 Thread Makara, Susan
: Kimberly Frick; Horsley, Randi - CRH; meditech-l@MTUsers.com Subject: RE: [MEDITECH-L] Issues with new eMAR verbiage re: time variances Your welcome, I have not tried this, just say it on their web site. Good Luck, From: Kimberly Frick [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [MEDITECH-L] Issues with new eMAR verbiage re: time variances

2007-05-31 Thread Bill Mullins
: Bill Mullins Subject: RE: [MEDITECH-L] Issues with new eMAR verbiage re: time variances It must be because I could not find anywhere in the pharmacy or nursing dictionaries where a rule could be built and attached to the eMAR. We do strugle with this issue but I think the nurses have gotten

RE: [MEDITECH-L] Issues with new eMAR verbiage re: time variances

2007-05-30 Thread Bill Mullins
tech-l@MTUsers.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kimberly Frick Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 7:32 AM To: Horsley, Randi - CRH; meditech-l@MTUsers.com Subject: RE: [MEDITECH-L] Issues with new eMAR verbiage re: time variances Yes, this was an issue fo

RE: [MEDITECH-L] Issues with new eMAR verbiage re: time variances

2007-05-30 Thread Kimberly Frick
h.org -Original Message- From: Bill Mullins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 7:14 PM To: Kimberly Frick; Horsley, Randi - CRH; meditech-l@MTUsers.com Subject: RE: [MEDITECH-L] Issues with new eMAR verbiage re: time variances Article ID: 26372 Date: 12/19/2006 Published: 1/31

RE: [MEDITECH-L] Issues with new eMAR verbiage re: time variances

2007-05-30 Thread Kenny Whiteside
Add us to the list of "Don't Likers"! We just returned from our BMV/eMAR training in 5.6 and we, too, were very confused by the wording of these messages. We would like to see Meditech change the wording to something more straight-forward such as "The time that you are documenting is 2 hrs and

RE: [MEDITECH-L] Issues with new eMAR verbiage re: time variances

2007-05-30 Thread Bill Mullins
k Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 7:32 AM To: Horsley, Randi - CRH; meditech-l@MTUsers.com Subject: RE: [MEDITECH-L] Issues with new eMAR verbiage re: time variances Yes, this was an issue for us too. We had to really explain the message in training because our users found it confusing. Our previous barc

RE: [MEDITECH-L] Issues with new eMAR verbiage re: time variances

2007-05-25 Thread Kimberly Frick
Yes, this was an issue for us too. We had to really explain the message in training because our users found it confusing. Our previous barcoded medication administration system had separate parameters to warn the user if a med was too early or too late. The warning message stated "too early" or