Justin,
You don't need two seperate DNS servers to do what you are
talking about. What you want is called SPLIT DNS and its a
future feature to be added to the TrinityOS doc. Basically,
you run one BIND process for one interface (external interface)
with one specific set of configuration fi
Hello,
-
Jing Li |
Electrical Engineering |
University of Ottawa|
Ottawa
Hello, Again
-
Jing Li |
Electrical Engineering |
University of Ottawa|
Ot
Hi Again folks.
Something I still don't understand that I need clarified, how exactly does DNS
interact
with ipmasq. I have done a lot of reading (how-to's, faq's, books on dns, ipmasq etc)
and
am still confused
here is the situation
I build a samba file server for my Windows Network (95,98
>I build a samba file server for my Windows Network (95,98 and NT), I use
myhome.com
>as my domain and assign addresses in the 192.168.1.xxx class. I put all the
names and
>ip addresses of all the computers in the /etc/hosts file on the samba server.
I point all
>the other machines to the samb
true, I realize this, but I belive I was led astray by the following statement in
Liinux
Network Toolkit p46. this during the installation and setup of RH5 in chapter 1. (you
know what they say about a little knowledge.
guess it's time to delve back into Linux Undercover and TCP/IP Network
OH GEEZ, DUH now I remember that is exacty the case
On 13 Sep 98, at 14:37, Pete wrote:
> afaik, .sam stands for "sample" - rename the file to just hosts
> thats because windows isn't looking in your hosts.sam file, but instead
> it's looking for a hosts file.the reason you are able to use t
>" On your own LAN it is reasonable to use your Linux box as your name
>server. Thus, if you include all you local network addresses in the
>/etc/hosts file. then your other computers can ask your Linux box for the
>actual addresses of any computer on your LAN by name and you do not have
>to
I have a 2 ethernet card machine that is performing firewalling (ipchains)
and masquerading. My INTERNET-side ethernet card has 2 addresses:
eth0 192.168.1.240 (addresses changed for security)
eth0:0192.168.1.241
I want the address used for masqueraded connections to be that
Hello,
remeber the sendmailproblem ?
It turns out that this problem was no sendmailproblem.
I had also problems with ftp, telnet etc. connection from my side to the
internet over ISDN. My side interrupted the connection for a datastream
with more than 10 kB.
But for masquerade connections from m
ok, lets try and get this sorted out.
> host.sam file on the windows boxes with the same info as in the the linux
>/etc/hosts. I
afaik, .sam stands for "sample" - rename the file to just hosts
> If I try using the names of the machines with ping, it fails, ie if I type
> ping sambabox from t
On Fri, 11 Sep 1998, Chris Johnson wrote:
> > I am using Ipportfw to forward traffic from a masq machine to an
> > NT web server. However I am looking at the logs that are generated
> > and I do not see any information regarding (org, com; request host
> > name). I only see the IP address. Wil
On Fri, 11 Sep 1998, Justin Slootsky wrote:
> I'm doing something bad, and I'm wondering how most people deal with the issue
>
> in my dns configuration files for slootsky.org, I define names for my local
> addresses. I do this so that machines on my local network can find each other
> as well
13 matches
Mail list logo