Re: [marxmail] New rules for radical resistance in the accelerated age of Trump

2025-02-09 Thread Charles Keener via groups.io
"alleges" ??? On Sunday, February 9, 2025 at 02:03:55 PM EST, duen filan via groups.io wrote: Bobby - "we finally get a woman posting..." Andie posted yesterday and  alleges she is a woman - a trans woman (AMAB). -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent

Re: [marxmail] New rules for radical resistance in the accelerated age of Trump

2025-02-09 Thread Bobby MacVeety via groups.io
And welcome to Andie and all who dream of a worker’s paradise On Sun, Feb 9, 2025 at 2:03 PM duen filan via groups.io wrote: > Bobby - "we finally get a woman posting..." > > Andie posted yesterday and alleges she is a woman - a trans woman (AMAB). > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Link

Re: [marxmail] New rules for radical resistance in the accelerated age of Trump

2025-02-09 Thread duen filan via groups.io
Bobby - "we finally get a woman posting..." Andie posted yesterday and alleges she is a woman - a trans woman (AMAB). -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#35120): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/35120 Mute This Topic: htt

Re: [marxmail] New rules for radical resistance in the accelerated age of Trump

2025-02-08 Thread Charles Keener via groups.io
Attacks on the LGBTQI and immigrant communities are also problematic for me.Transphobic bigotry is also personally hurtful for me. Charles On Sunday, February 9, 2025 at 12:10:33 AM EST, Mark Baugher wrote: > On Feb 8, 2025, at 12:27 PM, sartesian via groups.io > wrote: > > In foc

Re: [marxmail] New rules for radical resistance in the accelerated age of Trump

2025-02-08 Thread Mark Baugher
> On Feb 8, 2025, at 12:27 PM, sartesian via groups.io > wrote: > > In focusing on the "noise" of MacVeety's post you are missing the signal > which the reactionary content of Kristin's posts- her support of the > characterizations and misinformation pumped out by the reactionaries around,

Re: [marxmail] New rules for radical resistance in the accelerated age of Trump

2025-02-08 Thread Bobby MacVeety via groups.io
Thank you to sartesian for getting it My apologies to you Mark for offending you, definitely not my intention All your points are well made and I agree and I appreciate the effort and responsibility of moderation peace b On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 3:27 PM sartesian via groups.io wrote: > Mar

Re: [marxmail] New rules for radical resistance in the accelerated age of Trump

2025-02-08 Thread sartesian via groups.io
Mark, In focusing on the "noise" of MacVeety's post you are missing the signal which the reactionary content of  Kristin's posts- her support of the characterizations and misinformation pumped out by the reactionaries around, and of, Trump and Musk.   That's the real issue. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Re: [marxmail] New rules for radical resistance in the accelerated age of Trump

2025-02-08 Thread Mark Baugher
> > Such a shame, we finally get a woman posting and it’s a troll Here is a sentence devoid of self-awareness. The sentence trolls someone by accusing them of being a troll. It's also devoid of information, which is the real offense here: The mission of marxmail displayed on our masthead is

Re: [marxmail] New rules for radical resistance in the accelerated age of Trump

2025-02-08 Thread Bobby MacVeety via groups.io
Such a shame, we finally get a woman posting and it’s a troll On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 10:19 PM Kristin Bayrd via groups.io wrote: > There really isn’t a Resistance 2.0. I believe the reason is because most > Democrat voters agree with what Trump is doing. They support closing the > border and depo

Re: [marxmail] new rules for radical resistance in the accelerated age of Trump

2025-02-07 Thread duen filan via groups.io
kristan uses Trump-speak promoting his fascist agenda - "deporting criminals... drugging and mutilation of children". l would say more but I'm already on moderation. // 'First they came': Migrants, trans people first targets of Trump's fascist rule, struggle-la-lucha.org Socialist Unity

Re: [marxmail] New rules for radical resistance in the accelerated age of Trump

2025-02-07 Thread sartesian via groups.io
On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 10:19 PM, Kristin Bayrd wrote: > > Maybe Trump is actually the uniter he said he would be. Wouldn’t that be > something? For a century now, Marxists have debated the utility of voting > for one of the bourgeois parties, the Democrats. What if that time is > changing now? Wh

Re: [marxmail] New rules for radical resistance in the accelerated age of Trump

2025-02-07 Thread Anthony Boynton via groups.io
There really IS a resistance 2.0, but this time around, the resistance has been abandoned by the Democratic Party establishment. The people being attacked are resisting, slowly, but surely. The day without immigrants affected at least sixty US cities. There are three layers of resistance: the De

Re: [marxmail] New rules for radical resistance in the accelerated age of Trump

2025-02-07 Thread Charles Keener via groups.io
Most Democrats do not agree with Trump. Certainly, most do not oppose diversity, equity and inclusion. Many being deported are not criminals. Gender care is healthcare. Providingtransgender teens the care they seek - in consultation with their parents and doctors - is notdrugging or mutilating

Re: [marxmail] New rules for radical resistance in the accelerated age of Trump

2025-02-07 Thread Kristin Bayrd via groups.io
There really isn’t a Resistance 2.0. I believe the reason is because most Democrat voters agree with what Trump is doing. They support closing the border and deporting criminals, they support ending DEI, they support stopping the drugging and mutilation of children, they support keeping men out