On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Michael Widenius wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>> "MARK" == MARK CALLAGHAN writes:
>
>
>
> MARK> 703 1425 2593 4379 4176 4110 maria.nostat
> MARK> 684 1281 2439 4064 3896 3882 maria.stat
>
> MARK> oltp-ro run again for maria.nostat
>
Hi!
> "MARK" == MARK CALLAGHAN writes:
MARK> 703 1425 2593 4379 4176 4110 maria.nostat
MARK> 684 1281 2439 4064 3896 3882 maria.stat
MARK> oltp-ro run again for maria.nostat
MARK> 761 12782593440642074164
mari
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Michael Widenius wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>> "MARK" == MARK CALLAGHAN writes:
>
> MARK> This includes results from sysbench for Maria 5.2 with/without
> MARK> userstat enabled and for several other binaries. The results are
> MARK> throughput (transactions per second)
Hi!
> "MARK" == MARK CALLAGHAN writes:
MARK> This includes results from sysbench for Maria 5.2 with/without
MARK> userstat enabled and for several other binaries. The results are
MARK> throughput (transactions per second) for 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 concurrent
MARK> sessions.
MARK>
Hi!
> "MARK" == MARK CALLAGHAN writes:
MARK> Pardon my manual cut & paste, gmail didn't format the reply cleanly:
No problems
MARK> Thanks for cleaning this up.
MARK> The original implementations of SHOW USER_STATS and SHOW TABLE_STATS
MARK> had performance problems. SHOW TABLE_STATS w
This includes results from sysbench for Maria 5.2 with/without
userstat enabled and for several other binaries. The results are
throughput (transactions per second) for 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 concurrent
sessions.
This tests many binaries including 5.0.37 with the v2 Google patch (aka 503
Hi!
> "MARK" == MARK CALLAGHAN writes:
MARK> I am willing to bet that Monty's patch makes sysbench readonly much
MARK> slower with high concurrency on an 8-core server. But those problems
MARK> have been fixed in recent versions of the patch.
>>
>> One should note that I changed the patc
Hi!
> "Sergei" == Sergei Golubchik writes:
Sergei> Hi, Monty!
Sergei> On Oct 19, Michael Widenius wrote:
>>
>> I just finished applying / modifying / rewriting the userstats patch
>> to MariaDB 5.2 and will commit this in a moment.
Sergei> I wonder if anybody cares to monitor mutex usage
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:05 AM, Michael Widenius wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>> "MARK" == MARK CALLAGHAN writes:
>
> MARK> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 5:52 AM, Sergei Golubchik
> wrote:
>>> Hi, Monty!
>>>
>>> On Oct 19, Michael Widenius wrote:
I just finished applying / modifying / rewriting th
Hi!
> "MARK" == MARK CALLAGHAN writes:
MARK> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 5:52 AM, Sergei Golubchik
wrote:
>> Hi, Monty!
>>
>> On Oct 19, Michael Widenius wrote:
>>>
>>> I just finished applying / modifying / rewriting the userstats patch
>>> to MariaDB 5.2 and will commit this in a moment.
Hi, MARK!
On Oct 19, MARK CALLAGHAN wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 5:52 AM, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
> > On Oct 19, Michael Widenius wrote:
> >>
> >> I just finished applying / modifying / rewriting the userstats
> >> patch to MariaDB 5.2 and will commit this in a moment.
> >
> > I wonder if any
Pardon my manual cut & paste, gmail didn't format the reply cleanly:
>>>
>From Monty
I just finished applying / modifying / rewriting the userstats patch
to MariaDB 5.2 and will commit this in a moment.
As far as I know, the patch was originally made by Mark and his team,
then addopted by Percona
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 5:52 AM, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
> Hi, Monty!
>
> On Oct 19, Michael Widenius wrote:
>>
>> I just finished applying / modifying / rewriting the userstats patch
>> to MariaDB 5.2 and will commit this in a moment.
>
> I wonder if anybody cares to monitor mutex usage in MySQL.
Hi, Monty!
On Oct 19, Michael Widenius wrote:
>
> I just finished applying / modifying / rewriting the userstats patch
> to MariaDB 5.2 and will commit this in a moment.
I wonder if anybody cares to monitor mutex usage in MySQL.
This patch adds few new global mutexes that are locked at least on
14 matches
Mail list logo
