Hi! >>>>> "MARK" == MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcal...@gmail.com> writes:
<cut> MARK> 703 1425 2593 4379 4176 4110 maria.nostat MARK> 684 1281 2439 4064 3896 3882 maria.stat MARK> oltp-ro run again for maria.nostat MARK> 761 1278 2593 4406 4207 4164 maria.nostat Any idea why is this so different from the previous nostat ? <cut> MARK> 13418 24980 49777 94425 88083 86854 maria.nostat MARK> 13062 23378 46636 83449 77714 77245 maria.stat MARK> simple-allcols re-run for maria.nostat MARK> 12024 23891 50433 93778 88210 86127 maria.nostat Same here. MARK> So it looks like the regression at --num_threads==1 is real. <cut> Hakan, when you run tests, please make a test between MariaDB 5.1 and MariaDB 5.2 and check if there is any performance differences when 5.2 is run without userstats enabled (default). The only thing that I can think of that could cause any regression is that wrapper around ha_read calls. As these are small online functions I can't see how the overhead could be notable. Regards, Monty _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers Post to : maria-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
