[mailop] mails getting flagged as spam when deliverd to 1and1 / dkim headers stripped off

2018-03-28 Thread Stefan Bauer
Hi, anyone reading here from 1and1 / 1und1 german provider (united internet) and can comment on why our mails getting mostly flagged as [?SPAM] when sending to random 1and1 mailboxes? Please find header of sample mail attached exported from receivers mail agent. notice the missing dkim heade

[mailop] postfix postmaster wanted - howto instantly bounce when remote site refuses TLS

2018-09-10 Thread Stefan Bauer
Hi folks, i know this is not postfix mailing list - but postfix list said - its not supported yet - so hoping for a trick from postmasters ;) I'm running a small postfix site and testing with enforce TLS for outgoing mails. However my mails idle around in queue when remote server does not o

Re: [mailop] postfix postmaster wanted - howto instantly bounce when remote site refuses TLS

2018-09-10 Thread Stefan Bauer
Wow. Awesome. Thats it. Thank you and have a nice day. I totally missed that. Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Aaron Richton  Gesendet: Montag 10 September 2018 20:36 An: Stefan Bauer CC: mailop@mailop.org Betreff: Re: [mailop] postfix postmaster wanted - howto instantly bounce

[mailop] Best practice - running small outgoing only mailservice / network /ip-addresses

2018-09-19 Thread Stefan Bauer
Dear Users, we're running a small outgoing only mailservice for our customers from two /32 ip-addresses. Hosted in different data centers in germany. So far we have good reputation and non of our mails have been blocked. Recently, we get in trouble with hotmail because they seem to have blocked

Re: [mailop] Best practice - running small outgoing only mailservice / network /ip-addresses

2018-09-20 Thread Stefan Bauer
to their response and politely challenging them to do what you initially asked them to do. I suggest that you do that. You may have to do this more than once. Best regards, Al Iverson On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 2:56 AM Stefan Bauer wrote: > > Dear Users, > > we're running a sm

[mailop] No SNDS data for last 2 days

2018-10-09 Thread Stefan Bauer
Furthermore - the admin page is also broken and does infinite redirects: https://sendersupport.olc.protection.outlook.com/snds/addnetwork.aspx -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Joel Golliet  Gesendet: Montag 8 Oktober 2018 17:57 An: mailop@mailop.org Betreff: [mailop] No SNDS data f

Re: [mailop] No SNDS data for last 2 days

2018-10-10 Thread Stefan Bauer
isn’t being collected. MS has never filled in old data. As I understand it, they don’t have the data to be able to backfill missing days.    laura     Stefano On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 at 09:49, Stefan Bauer mailto:s...@plzk.de> > wrote: Furthermore - the admin page is also broken and d

[mailop] hotmail.com blocks again for no reasons - this is insane

2018-10-29 Thread Stefan Bauer
Hi, anyone else in trouble with hotmail.com again? We are a very low sending MX without any spam from our range. It started at 17:00 that hotmail was not offering TLS. I have no clue, why this is the case. Is this some kind of spam defense voodoo? Our MX tried again after an hour and got

[mailop] marketplace.amazon.* not offering STARTTLS - amazon contact needed

2018-11-14 Thread Stefan Bauer
Hi, we just noticed that marketplace.amazon.* is not providing STARTTLS. Any amazon employee around and can comment on this? We are in 2018! and would like to have STARTTLS. Thanks. Non-authoritative answer:marketplace.amazon.de     mail exchanger = 10 retail-smtp-in-eu-2.amazon.co.uk. ma

[mailop] freenet.de rejecting with 451 that should be a perm error (suspicious message)

2018-11-15 Thread Stefan Bauer
Hi, we just noticed that freenet.de is reject some of our mails with 451 Suspicious message, please come back later (in reply to end of DATA command) That makes no sense to us. If mail looks fishy to freenet, they should generate a perm. error (5xx) and not let us try over and over agai

[mailop] Strato Postmaster around? relay.rzone.de does not offer STARTTLS

2019-02-12 Thread Stefan Bauer
Hi, a lot of strato customers are using relay.rzone.de as backup-MX. Unfortunately, this host does not offer STARTTLS. 220 relay.rzone.de ESMTP RZmta 44.9 ready (bx3) ehlo ME 250-relay.rzone.de greets my-ip 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-PIPELINING 250-8BITMIME 250-DELIVERBY 250-SIZE 104857600

Re: [mailop] Strato Postmaster around? relay.rzone.de does not offer STARTTLS

2019-02-13 Thread Stefan Bauer
community :) Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ken O'Driscoll via mailop  Gesendet: Mittwoch 13 Februar 2019 10:49 An: mailop@mailop.org Betreff: Re: [mailop] Strato Postmaster around? relay.rzone.de does not offer STARTTLS On Wed, 2019-02-13 at 07:31 +0000, Stefan Bauer wrot

[mailop] Howto be a good mailop (best practice / insights wanted)

2019-05-08 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Hi, we're providing a small smtp sent-service for our customers (via submission port / auth only - postfix). ~ 7.000 outgoing mails / day (via 2 hosts in different data centers/ip networks). As the amount of mails increase, we would like to be ready for - stolen auth-data to our service

Re: [mailop] Howto be a good mailop (best practice / insights wanted)

2019-05-08 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
n Wed, 2019-05-08 at 16:45 +0000, Stefan Bauer via mailop wrote: > we have in place: > > only allow pre-defined sender-addresses after auth > monitor mail-queues for high connection count > monitor RBLs if we're listed > only allow single mail / 5s to be sent outgo

Re: [mailop] Howto be a good mailop (best practice / insights wanted)

2019-05-31 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
l via mailop  Gesendet: Mittwoch 8 Mai 2019 20:01 An: mailop@mailop.org Betreff: Re: [mailop] Howto be a good mailop (best practice / insights wanted) On Wed, 2019-05-08 at 16:45 +0000, Stefan Bauer via mailop wrote: > we have in place: > > only allow pre-defined sender-addresses after auth

Re: [mailop] Howto be a good mailop (best practice / insights wanted)

2019-05-31 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
treff: Re: [mailop] Howto be a good mailop (best practice / insights wanted) On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 11:03 +0000, Stefan Bauer via mailop wrote: > Hi Ken, > > thanks again for your input. Regarding > Add a custom header (X-abuse) > > is this really a thing? Could not find many mail

Re: [mailop] Microsoft blacklisting a /16

2019-06-05 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Please keep this on-list. This is of great help for all other mailops to improve own setup. Thank you. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Hetzner Blacklist via mailop  Gesendet: Mittwoch 5 Juni 2019 17:43 An: mailop@mailop.org; Michael Peddemors Betreff: Re: [mailop] Microsoft blacklistin

[mailop] No SMTP-Auth in Office365 Mailflow Connectors - seriously Microsoft?

2019-06-14 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Hi, can anyone confirm that I'm just blind or that this is not possible with Microsofts Exchange Online (Office365) cloud solutions? This works fine in all on-premise installations. I can not specify username/password for smtp authentication nor any certs. I just want to set outgoing mai

[mailop] How open is openxchange? + can not process ics-files in inbox with OX

2023-06-21 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Hi folks, we are still evaluating OpenXchange but having a hard time, finding an active community around this software. The public bugzilla tracker was shut down¹, the public forum is more or less inactive and the official mailing lists are announce only² lists. Are there any other places to dis

[mailop] Communication / Feature Requests & Bugfixing in OpenXchange

2023-10-25 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Dear Mailops, anyone in here using OpenXchange? We are still evaluating OX but having a hard time to get real informations or feedback at all. a, I made some feature-recommendations ¹²³ in the forum, not a single reply :/ Even a reply like, we do not accept requests this way would help. b, There

[mailop] any postmaster or contact to knauf.com around? delivery issues

2024-04-30 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Hi, knauf.com is accepting much of our delivered mails, however afterwards probably drop them as recipients reported via phone, that none of the mails arrive in their mailboxes. Mail to postmaster@ and a known contact at knauf.com did not yield any response so far. Apr 23 10:12:54 mx3 postfix/sm

Re: [mailop] any postmaster or contact to knauf.com around? delivery issues

2024-04-30 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Wow. Indeed. Thank you. The ip is 217.160.0.245 and yes, the complete ASN is blocked. Am Di., 30. Apr. 2024 um 13:50 Uhr schrieb Marco Moock : > > Am 30.04.2024 um 12:28:50 Uhr schrieb Stefan Bauer via mailop: > > > Sender-Domain IP is in UCEPROTECTL3, however none of his sending &

[mailop] Avoiding bounces - custom spamfilter behind real-spamfilter that reject mails

2019-10-24 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Hi, here is a thing, that we do not see a real solution to it and would be happy, to get some ideas from other mailops. We are doing MX-spamfilter service for some customers and forward "clean" mails to customer mailservers. We are doing recipient-checks before accepting mails. Sometime

[mailop] winmail.dat TNEF - howto behave?

2019-11-14 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Hi, we run some antispam-mailservers with ~ 10.000 mails / day for our customers. Due to emotet and stuff, we started blocking some file extensions with great success. Sometimes "bad" attachment slip through as they are encoded by TNEF. Our spamfilter is not able to de-code it. Not even som

[mailop] reputation with DKIM when d= differs from sender domain?

2019-11-14 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Hi, this list is of great help for me to be a good mailop. thank you. Now the question: Is it bad - in terms of reputation - when domain in dkim-header (d=...) differs from senders address? signing is done correctly and pub-key is present at domain of corse - specified with d=... lik

[mailop] Ewetel postmaster wanted - your IP 116.203.31.6 seems to be dynamic - please use the smarthost of your ISP

2020-03-09 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Any ewetel postmaster around? One of our IPs (subject) get flagged as dynamic during delivery to ewetel. However this IP is static. No response to postmaster@ yet. thank you. Stefan ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosign

Re: [mailop] Ewetel postmaster wanted - your IP 116.203.31.6 seems to be dynamic - please use the smarthost of your ISP

2020-03-09 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
tefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Andrew C Aitchison  Gesendet: Montag 9 März 2020 10:47 An: Stefan Bauer CC: mailop Betreff: Re: [mailop] Ewetel postmaster wanted - your IP 116.203.31.6 seems to be dynamic - please use the smarthost of your ISP On Mon, 9 Mar 2020, Stefan Bauer via m

Re: [mailop] Ewetel postmaster wanted - your IP 116.203.31.6 seems to be dynamic - please use the smarthost of your ISP

2020-03-09 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Vytis Marciulionis  Gesendet: Montag 9 März 2020 14:52 An: Stefan Bauer CC: mailop Betreff: Re: [mailop] Ewetel postmaster wanted - your IP 116.203.31.6 seems to be dynamic - please use the smarthost of your ISP Hi Stefan, This could also happen because your PTR record of sending IP address resolves w

Re: [mailop] Ewetel postmaster wanted - your IP 116.203.31.6 seems to be dynamic - please use the smarthost of your ISP

2020-03-09 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Hi Jan, i tried postmas...@ewe.net <mailto:postmas...@ewe.net> and postmas...@ewetel.de. Will now try the third (your first suggestion) :) thanks. Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jan-Philipp Benecke  Gesendet: Montag 9 März 2020 15:53 An: Stefan Bauer CC:

Re: [mailop] Ewetel postmaster wanted - your IP 116.203.31.6 seems to be dynamic - please use the smarthost of your ISP

2020-03-10 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
2 | 26180 Rastede | Germany Geschäftsführung: Jens Klibingat, Sebastian Schwarz & Sebastian Strzelecki Aufsichtsrat: Rolf Hilchner & Heinz-Wilhelm Bogena Stefan Bauer via mailop schrieb am 09.03.20 um 15:03: Hi, it's just DNS round robin for our senders. did not had a sigle is

[mailop] No mails from fbl.returnpath.net

2020-04-22 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Hi, anyone using fbl.returnpath.net and recently received mails? We are low-volume senders with around 5.000 mails / day and did not receive a single mail since signup - thats 8 weeks ago. This could be a good sign for us, or a general problem. FBL mail address is unfiltered and monito

[mailop] hostedemail.com contact - IP manually blacklisted - 116.203.31.6

2020-05-18 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Hi, one of our sending IPs (116.203.31.6)  seems to got blacklisted by hostedemail.com. However this ip adress is not blacklisted. We monitor around ~ 50 public DNS-BLs. Feedbackloops did not generate a single report yet. Can anyone bring some light into this? smtp May 18 16:04:19 mx3 postfix

Re: [mailop] hostedemail.com contact - IP manually blacklisted - 116.203.31.6

2020-05-18 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
liche Nachricht- Von: Brian Ellwood via mailop  Gesendet: Montag 18 Mai 2020 18:00 An: Stefan Bauer CC: mailop Betreff: Re: [mailop] hostedemail.com contact - IP manually blacklisted - 116.203.31.6 You should find assistance via h...@opensrs.com. ___ m

[mailop] dcc down / dead?

2020-05-23 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Hi, seems like the main DCC servers are down (dcc1-6.dcc-servers.net), also the website. Archive last mails are from end 19. Anybody knows more? Did i miss some announcement? Cheers Stefan ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://ch

Re: [mailop] [External] dcc down / dead?

2020-05-23 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
looks great again! Thank you folks. If the domain rans out again, just drop me a note and i will be more than happy to pay for domain & hosting as i really appreciate this service. Stefan ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosig

[mailop] keeping rejected mails in queue for second attempt acceptable?

2020-06-06 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Hi, once in a while, some of our outgoing customer mails are rejected by remote sites with a 500 code because one of our sending IPs are temporary blacklisted. or due to other reasons we are not able to deliver the mail. I'm only talking about cases, where the mail itself, is not the reject r

Re: [mailop] keeping rejected mails in queue for second attempt acceptable?

2020-06-07 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Ralph Seichter via mailop  * How and when would you decide that the recipient responding with 5xx was due to the message itself or due to a blacklisted IP address? That's not something that can be decided based on SMTP. You are right. I can not rely on any s

Re: [mailop] A1/aon.at contact

2020-07-07 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
A1 is busy fixing there network¹. https://www.zdnet.com/article/hackers-breached-a1-telekom-austrias-largest-isp/ SCNR. Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Sabine Rogg via mailop  Gesendet: Dienstag 7 Juli 2020 12:25 An: mailop@mailop.org Betreff: [mailop] A1/aon.at contact Hel

[mailop] Post-processing Journal-Mails coming from O365, forwardedMail

2020-07-07 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Hi, there is a feature in O365 that forwards mails (in/out/both..) to an archive-mailbox for long-term archiving. We grab this mails via pop. However our available mail-readers (Thunderbird, Kopano) show the original mail as attachment. This makes it very hard for handling/searching/reading

Re: [mailop] Post-processing Journal-Mails coming from O365, forwardedMail

2020-07-07 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
li 2020 15:55 An: Stefan Bauer ; mailop Betreff: Re: [mailop] Post-processing Journal-Mails coming from O365, forwardedMail Have you tried journal rules? https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/exchange/security-and-compliance/journaling/configure-journaling Best, Faisal Misle MCSA: Office 365 PGP Key

Re: [mailop] Post-processing Journal-Mails coming from O365, forwardedMail

2020-07-08 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Von: Matthias Leisi via mailop  Gesendet: Donnerstag 9 Juli 2020 00:27 An: mailop Betreff: Re: [mailop] Post-processing Journal-Mails coming from O365, forwardedMail there is a feature in O365 that forwards mails (in/out/both..) to an archive-mailbox for long-term archiving. We grab this mails

Re: [mailop] Post-processing Journal-Mails coming from O365, forwardedMail

2020-07-09 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
, at 22:36, Stefan Bauer via mailop wrote: > there is a feature in O365 that forwards mails (in/out/both..) to an > archive-mailbox for long-term archiving. > > We grab this mails via pop. However our available mail-readers > (Thunderbird, Kopano) show the original mail as attachme

[mailop] host mx.tiscali.co.uk[62.24.139.42] said: 453 4.1.1 wJGljsu8zj2dp Recipient Lookup Failed (TT513)

2020-07-17 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Hi, smtp Jul 17 07:50:52 mx2 postfix/smtp[31049]: 51CBC5EBE3: to=, relay=mx.tiscali.co.uk[62.24.139.42]:25, delay=9509, delays=9505/3/0.35/1.2, dsn=4.1.1, status=deferred (host mx.tiscali.co.uk[62.24.139.42] said: 453 4.1.1 wJGljsu8zj2dp Recipient Lookup Failed (TT513) (in reply to RCPT TO c

Re: [mailop] host mx.tiscali.co.uk[62.24.139.42] said: 453 4.1.1 wJGljsu8zj2dp Recipient Lookup Failed (TT513)

2020-07-18 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
?   From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Stefan Bauer via mailop Sent: Friday, July 17, 2020 1:08 AM To: mailop Subject: [mailop] host mx.tiscali.co.uk[62.24.139.42] said: 453 4.1.1 wJGljsu8zj2dp Recipient Lookup Failed (TT513)   Hi,   smtp Jul 17 07:50:52 mx2 postfix/smtp

Re: [mailop] Outbound from M365 to relay off our SMTP with SMTPAUTH

2020-07-21 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Hi, my last info is, that office365 does not support authentication with external connectors. However you can authenticate O365 with your smtp relay. I run some mixed authentication. We check the source ip's¹ from microsofts range, check the O365 client cert and check the mail-from address

[mailop] microsofts SNDS unavailable - anyone else?

2020-07-23 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
https://postmaster.live.com/snds/ throws: Server Error in '/SNDS' Application. Runtime Error Description: An exception occurred while processing your request. Additionally, another exception occurred while executing the custom error page for the first exc

[mailop] Sophos appliance reject mails from specific domains with Administrative prohibition, confirmed spam in logs

2020-08-20 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Hi, since days, we try to find out why one of our customer domain is blocked, when sending mails to remote sites, where Sophos UTM-appliance (e.g. UTM-430) are in place. All we see is at smtp level: : host mail3.famo24.de[80.155.146.58] said: 550     Administrative prohibition (in reply

[mailop] Sophos appliance reject mails from specific domains with Administrative prohibition, confirmed spam in logs

2020-08-20 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
  Gesendet: Donnerstag 20 August 2020 11:13 An: Stefan Bauer CC: mailop Betreff: Re: [mailop] Sophos appliance reject mails from specific domains with Administrative prohibition, confirmed spam in logs Hello. You need to contact Sophos support (through) their website. They are using an internal lis

Re: [mailop] What's the point of secondary MX servers?

2020-12-18 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
We use low priority MX records on newly deployed hosts to be able to monitor the behaviour of these hosts without getting the full load. If all looks sane, we bump the priority after a few hours/days. Stefan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: John Levine via mailop  Gesendet: Donnerstag

Re: [mailop] What's the point of secondary MX servers?

2020-12-18 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Grant, Project Tar looks like a privacy nightmare to me. Routing my mails to a stranger in case senders just don't honor the standard and dont talk to my primary MX. They promise to reject, but who knows. At least in EU/Germany, that is against the law (GDPR/DSGVO) Stefan Von: Grant Ta

[mailop] What's the point of secondary MX servers?

2020-12-18 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Grant Taylor via mailop  > At least in EU/Germany, that is against the law (GDPR/DSGVO) Would you please elaborate? Either on list or direct, your choice. If i setup for customer-domains MX records in a way, that a third-party is handling/processing meta

[mailop] observation - *OLC.PROTECTION.outlook.com does not offer STARTTLS when IP is blocked

2020-12-31 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Hi, one of our pub-ip seems to be blocked by MS. Side effect is, that olc.protection... is not offering starttls in this case. Anyone else seen that? # telnet eur.olc.protection.outlook.com. 25 Trying 104.47.18.161... Connected to eur.olc.protection.outlook.com. Escape character is '^]'. 22

[mailop] microsoft rejects mail to live.de but accepts for hosted exchange - 116.203.31.6 - part of their network is on our block list (S3140)

2020-12-31 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Hi, anyone aware of a bigger block at the moment? We're having a single IP 116.203.31.6 but microsofts reject-message looks like there is a bigger block ongoing. Network is from hetzner (DE). 737675DD1E: to=, relay=eur.olc.protection.outlook.com[104.47.14.33]:25, delay=3.4, delays=0.01/

Re: [mailop] openssl on Ubuntu 20.04 - implications for email

2021-01-06 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Just my 5 cents: As a small mail operator (10K mails/day) we disabled ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

[mailop] How does one operate mailman3 with correct From & Sender Address - like this list?

2021-02-04 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Hi, I'm planning to operate a mailman list and want to make sure, that Reply-To is untouched (seems to be default on MM3) and From is list-address and Sender is list-bounce address. However i do not see a simply way in MM3 to specify that. The settings - per list - only offer Anonymous

Re: [mailop] Delivery issues with gmx recipients

2021-03-12 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Might be related with the recent DMARC changes announced by 1&1. - Just a short info to whom it might interest: Very soon, we will go live with DMARC check on incoming mails for all mailboxes operated by WEB.DE, GMX & mail.com. That covers several hundred of recipient domains

[mailop] www.trustedsource.org - how to check/unblock/contact?

2021-03-24 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Hi, we fail to deliver mail to status=deferred (host srvmail.diversa-gmbh.com[62.91.109.87] refused to talk to me: 550 5.5.0 550 5.7.1 IP address refused. To find the reputation of this IP address, visit www.trustedsource.org.) Webpage only alows to checkfor URLs. Message indicates a blo

[mailop] WG: Best practices for outbound rate limiting?

2021-04-28 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
do not only send many mails at once, they send also at very low rate but ongoing. Rate limiting would not take care of this. Stefan Bauer. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: missytake via mailop  Gesendet: Dienstag 27 April 2021 18:31 An: mailop@mailop.org Betreff: [mailop] Best

[mailop] relay=mx.rheinmetall.ca[207.61.105.111]:25 - 5.7.1 IP address refused. To find the reputation of this IP address, visit www.trustedsource.org

2021-11-05 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Hi, can anyone help to understand the error message? My sending ip is not in any list i'm aware of, listed. The webpage trustedsource.org does also not allow to check IP-addresses. Anyone from McAfee or Reinmetall around? sending ip is: 116.203.31.6 / 2a01:4f8:c0c:92be::1 Thanks.

[mailop] relay=mx.rheinmetall.ca[207.61.105.111]:25 - 5.7.1 IP address refused. To find the reputation of this IP address, visit www.trustedsource.org

2021-11-06 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Hi, can anyone help to understand the error message? My sending ip is not in any list i'm aware of, listed. The webpage trustedsource.org does also not allow to check IP-addresses. Anyone from McAfee or Reinmetall around? sending ip is: 116.203.31.6 / 2a01:4f8:c0c:92be::1 Thanks. Stefan

Re: [mailop] relay=mx.rheinmetall.ca[207.61.105.111]:25 - 5.7.1 IP address refused. To find the reputation of this IP address, visit www.trustedsource.org

2021-11-06 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
ould easily be the latter, I am quite unfamiliar with the > message myself. I'm going to suggest that this is an on premises > filtering system at the recipient's end and that the only way to resolve > it is to have your contact inside the company reach out to their IT > departm

[mailop] double-singing with 2 independant DKIM-signatures for same domain

2022-08-26 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Hi folks, are 2 DKIM-signatures in a mail with different s= but for same d= a problem in general? According to RFC 6376 4.2 i would say no, the receiver should check both signatures and not perm fail on the first, however we see some trouble with some recipients: Log from receivers: 2022-08-22T

Re: [mailop] double-singing with 2 independant DKIM-signatures for same domain

2022-08-26 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
? Or just that > one signature is failing to verify with DKIM? > > laura > > > > On 26 Aug 2022, at 10:32, Stefan Bauer via mailop > wrote: > > Hi folks, > > are 2 DKIM-signatures in a mail with different s= but for same d= a > problem in general? > >

Re: [mailop] double-singing with 2 independant DKIM-signatures for same domain

2022-08-26 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
; > laura > > > > On 26 Aug 2022, at 11:02, Stefan Bauer via mailop > wrote: > > The other party is putting our mails in junk/spam folder. Mail is not > rejected and reports, that the reason is invalid dkim signatur. > > Am Fr., 26. Aug. 2022 um 11:56 Uhr schrieb Laur

[mailop] Open-Xchange - user source/management - best practice?

2023-05-03 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
Dear Mailops, I'm evaluating open-Xchange and hoping to reach some of you that also use it and can find some answers as the public open-xchange forum is rather dead and no mailinglist exists. How do you maintain the OX-own user-database and keep them in sync with other directories(LDAP,ADS) regar

Re: [mailop] [OFFLIST] Re: Open-Xchange - user source/management - best practice?

2023-05-03 Thread Stefan Bauer via mailop
tefan Am Do., 4. Mai 2023 um 02:43 Uhr schrieb Michael Peddemors < mich...@linuxmagic.com>: > > Do you have a use case you can share, eg type of customers, and number > of accounts? Might have some recommendations. > > > > On 2023-05-03 10:24, Stefan Bauer vi