On 06Jun24, Viktor Dukhovni via mailop apparently wrote:
> > I'd also raise it with Aussie Broadband and see if they are able to
I too raised a ticket with ABB as I accidentally discovered that
67.231.157.0/24 was not
able to reach my mail servers on the ABB network. Fortunately in enough time
On 06Jun24
> I too raised a ticket with ABB as I accidentally discovered that
> 67.231.157.0/24 was not
> able to reach my mail servers on the ABB network.
FYI. ABB have worked with the other network ops and recently fixed this routing
issue.
Not strictly a mailops issue per se, but 67.231.157
On 11Jul24, Cody Millard via mailop apparently wrote:
> What is "A RR" ?
Sounds like they're talking about DNS A RRs (Address records).
Circa 1986 the DNS community introduced the MX RR with a view to transitioning
away from
how a mail client would look up an address RR directly for a target dom
On 12Jul24, Bill Cole via mailop apparently wrote:
> > Nearly 1/2 a century later, it's still the case that most mail clients
> > will look for address RRs in the absence of an MX.
>
> Because failing to do so would be ignoring a requirement of the SMTP
> specification.
Yes. Everyone knows this
On 10Oct24, Al Iverson via mailop apparently wrote:
> > > If you've got any evidence of x= in the wild that you care to share,
> > > thank you kindly in advance!
I'd be curious as to evidence of systems which actually re-categorise email
based on
x=. And how often such recategorisations are real
On 22Sep24, Marco Moock apparently wrote:
> Am 22.09.2024 um 09:18:27 Uhr schrieb Mark Delany via mailop:
> > and a lot of false negatives on ipv6, but otherwise it seems
> > pretty solid.
>
> They don't support IPv6 at all, so no spamtrap can be hit via IPv6.
Yes, th
On 22Sep24, Bastian Blank via mailop apparently wrote:
> > Ditto, they aggressively list Aussie Broadband's entire AS,
> > https://www.uceprotect.net/en/rblcheck.php?ipr=144.6.86.210
>
> UCEProtect lists this ip in Level 2. So this not about the single IP,
According to https://www.uceprotect
On 22Sep24, Andrew C Aitchison via mailop apparently wrote:
>
> On Sun, 22 Sep 2024, Mark Delany via mailop wrote:
>
> > As we all know, there are only two globally addressable
> > communication systems on the planet and only one of those allows
> > participation
On 09Dec24, John Levine via mailop apparently wrote:
> It has been my impression that for many years about 90% of the mail a
> system typically
Does anyone have research which describes a "typical" mail system?
> a lot of attempted deliveries on my small MTAs.
Does anyone have research which cor
On 22Nov24, Eric Tykwinski via mailop apparently wrote:
> Here’s the thing that confuses me, and perhaps because I don’t know
> Interplanetary File System as much as I should.
> You have /var/spool/mail/user which changes every time you receive/delete a
> message, and that changes the hash/CID wh
On 22Nov24, John Levine apparently wrote:
> You can make the problem a lot easier by putting each message in a different
> file like Maildir
For the mail payload sure, Maildir offers a likely unique ID for storage, but
it doesn't
really help much with metadata or for syncing and resolving mailbo
On 19Feb25, Viktor Dukhovni via mailop apparently wrote:
> > Is this regardless of the type of attachment sent? I just tested a
> > message with an attached ".txt" file, and it got through submission into
> > Postfix just fine.
Turns out that small attachments work, but...
> You could try Apple
I'm seeing a curious submission failure with the latest macOS Mail.app (Sequoia
15.3.1)
and wondering whether others are seeing it also. The submission mechanism is
via an
stunnel into an SMTP server and stunnel/openssl was also recently upgraded so
it may be a
server-side issue thus my survey h
13 matches
Mail list logo
