The amount of people who treat the Spam button as a Delete button is
staggering.
*gives AOL death stares*
It’s a big enough problem for me currently that we’ve got users who mark our
invoices as spam, then bitch/whine about not getting auction notices and
notifications of wining bids.
Sent
Out of curiosity, how are your clients going to prevent sharing of information protected under the FDCPA with third parties?E-mail addresses aren't guaranteed to actually belong to the person you think you are sending to.-- Brie(She/they)The Summit Open Source Development Grouphttps://sosdg.org(Sen
Hello,
You’ve got a few issues that are going to play into this - OVH as your host,
subdomain off of a free dns name provider...
Email isn’t a public utility or a right. I’m a DNSbl maintainer - myself and
others have battled this out over the last 20 years to ensure that even the
courts reco
On 10/7/2019 9:50 AM, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
Of course I know what ampr.org is, and if*this* domain is facing that
issue, then I feel speechless and very, very mad at Google.
Of course, nobody can succeed individually in a lawsuit against Google. But
maybe*all* senders who are facing
On 10/7/2019 10:06 AM, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
Ah, where are the times when the Internet was about mutual understanding and
co-operation by the admins, to maintain highest possible connectivity... And
if someone didn't get their email delivered, admins from both sides treated
this as a hi
On 10/7/2019 10:49 AM, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
Well, we all have right to protect ourselves from actual spammer.
But not from "someone who I think might look like a spammer".
There is no difference when it comes to the rights of what I can do with
the equipment/bandwidth I own.
I re
On 10/10/2019 6:10 AM, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
It's a basic mistake to operate on whole netblocks and not individual
senders.
Let me ask you something very straight forward.
How much do you pay Google so that you can e-mail their users?
I know you don't have a service contract or agre
I think you are trying to revive that long and pointless thread about gmail
putting peoples messages in the junk folder.
I’ll say it again - blunt and brutal, but reality.
owns their mail servers and can decide how they
want to process mail and who they accept mail from.
Unless you have arr
On 10/23/2019 10:35 AM, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> Because you repeat your rant on this topic again and again,
It's not a rant any moreso then your suggestions about regulation,
lawsuits to get your way with e-mail providers, etc.
> I (as the person
> who started the previous thread you are referr
On 10/23/2019 1:33 PM, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
It's *you* who is constantly bringing up the topic of regulations and
lawsuits and not me.
Seems you must be pretty obsessed with this.
*clears her throat loudly*
Message-ID: <20191007155046.gb21...@rafa.eu.org>
To quote you...
Of course, nobody
On 10/23/2019 3:05 PM, Noel Butler via mailop wrote:
Reality is, your mere suggestion of regulation / courts to make
providers accept your e-mail makes you a liability to my services.
That will never happen, precedent already set, remember that West
Australian super spammer from decades gone by,
I use Exim, and have been for a lng time. The multi-file config
package in Debian is quite nice and makes it easy to configure and
customize.
On 12/5/2019 4:36 PM, Large Hadron Collider via mailop wrote:
The subject says it all.
___
mailop ma
> On Dec 6, 2019, at 9:42 AM, Paul Ebersman via mailop
> wrote:
>
> And attempts to get emojis in domain names (don't ask...).
... I don’t know why, but this one line makes me want to go on a rampage.
Like streets run red level of rage.
___
mailo
On 2/2/2020 10:03 PM, Tom Wong-Cornall via mailop wrote:
As another (very) small-time personal/business server operator, I'm
intrigued with the above. I, too, had mail going straight to junk with
Gmail and Outlook despite doing my best to be a `good sender' with
SPF/DKIM and coming up clean on ev
I unfortunately had to stop accepting mail from mail.ru many years ago due to
abuse/spam.
Big providers do a pretty decent job of filtering inbound abuse/spam, but do a
really shitty job of controlling outbound abuse/spam.
Most of my systems have geo filtering in place too - China, Russia, In
On 5/11/2020 11:45 AM, Matt V via mailop wrote:
On 2020-05-05 11:09 p.m., Andy Smith via mailop wrote:
I've been told by at least one Sendgrid person that they have requested
membership to the list and are awaiting administrator approvals...
Better late than never I guess...
--
Brielle Br
On 8/19/2020 11:06 PM, Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
On 2020-08-18 20:23:37 (+0800), Atro Tossavainen via mailop wrote:
The SendGrid account sending these yesterday is 13999362.
The one I've seen most often is 12340469 with 9789821 a close second and
8512936 in third place.
I just started
Oops, hit the send keybind by accident while trying to paste... Lets
try this again.
On 8/19/2020 11:06 PM, Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
On 2020-08-18 20:23:37 (+0800), Atro Tossavainen via mailop wrote:
The SendGrid account sending these yesterday is 13999362.
The one I've seen most oft
Hello,
Anyone here have a contact for Zoom in re of webinar spam being sent
from their platform via Sendgrid owned IPs?
I'm rather unhappy with the fact they're allowing people to spam with no
unsubscribe or report feature.
I know Sendgrid is a hot steaming pile of dog excrement these days
he offending message, I can have
it looked at.
Cheers,
Luke
On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 11:39 AM Brielle via mailop <mailto:mailop@mailop.org>> wrote:
Hello,
Anyone here have a contact for Zoom in re of webinar spam being sent
from their platform via Sendgrid owned IPs?
On 7/15/21 12:26 PM, John Levine via mailop wrote:
It appears that Tim Bray via mailop said:
Just check which DNS servers you are using. And lot of the 8.8.8.8
and 9.9.9.9 of the world and similar don't work very well for RBLs
s/very well/at all/
I usually install a local unbound.
You
On 7/16/21 10:58 AM, Al Iverson via mailop wrote:
Each resolver node is set up of multiple pools that consist of resolvers
I run, my provider, and 8.8.8.8/1.1.1.1.
If you want to guide this dummy on how to run a local resolver like
that, I'd appreciate the tips. :) I was trying to get out of t
These still seem to be coming in quite consistently... Same Zoom
sendgrid account.
Any updates on whats going on with this, Luke?
On 7/6/21 2:44 PM, Brielle via mailop wrote:
Here's the two that they all share:
Return-path:
Return-path:
(original unmunged version sent directly t
Like the title asks?
Still seeing it daily in my logs hitting the system filters... Same
source accounts, same general bodies with no unsubscribes, sent through
Zoom's accounts at Sendgrid...
I don't mean to be impatient and all, but it has been a while...
--
Brielle Bruns
The Summit Open S
*squints her eyes as she recognizes the name Jaroslaw Rafa*
I may not have the best memory these days, but I seem to remember you are the
one who wanted to bring lawsuits against everyone who runs junk / spam filters.
Message-ID: <20191007155046.gb21...@rafa.eu.org>
Specifically against google
On 8/4/21 5:40 PM, Luke via mailop wrote:
The account in question was told they need to clean up their act about 4
weeks ago. A week later we saw their overall sending volume drop by more
than 66%. Bounces and spam report percentages dropped. That data, along
with some unscientific subject line
On 8/5/21 9:38 AM, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
Definitely your memory fails, or your understanding fails;). First, I was
not talking about "everyone who runs junk / spam filters", but specifically
about Google.
Bringing against one just opens the door for more. The minute you
create that
On 8/5/21 8:53 AM, Brielle via mailop wrote:
On 8/4/21 5:40 PM, Luke via mailop wrote:
The account in question was told they need to clean up their act about
4 weeks ago.
Thank you for following up with this information. Its much appreciated.
Just another followup, having looked through
On 8/5/21 9:41 AM, John Levine via mailop wrote:
It appears that Brielle via mailop said:
There's also the matter of the lack of unsubscribe... Has zoom
explained why they are allowing their customers to send unconfirmed
opt-out mail with no unsubscribe option?
Good point. That's
On 8/5/21 9:41 AM, John Levine wrote:
It appears that Brielle via mailop said:
There's also the matter of the lack of unsubscribe... Has zoom
explained why they are allowing their customers to send unconfirmed
opt-out mail with no unsubscribe option?
Good point. That's one
Are they only needing something super simple and like one mailbox?
If they have an iPhone/Mac/iPad and pay for at least the $0.99 iCloud storage
plan, can now add a custom domain for free to iCloud email at:
https://beta.iCloud.com
IMAP and smtp are fully supported.
Sent from my iPad
> On Sep
On 9/9/21 1:30 AM, Jarland Donnell via mailop wrote:
Domains taken from the envelope senders of a recent round:
https://github.com/mxroute/rspamd_rules/commit/3b136e8812c74f35a32e61c8ad21f1f176c5b32d#diff-17eafba14786093de653e1da1991e0677cd7798c2ac277f196ab0eb09f24fc49
Ohhh, nice. rspamd maps
On 9/12/21 9:59 AM, Alessandro Vesely via mailop wrote:
On Fri 10/Sep/2021 16:53:35 +0200 Mike Hammett wrote:
I'm sending from a single IP. It's just a low-volume server. Maybe 10
- 20 messages a day?
You could increase that volume by sending DMARC aggregate reports.
Is there any (prefer
> On Sep 20, 2021, at 9:05 AM, Florian Effenberger via mailop
> wrote:
>
> seems rspamd supports this: https://rspamd.com/doc/modules/dmarc.html (see
> "Reporting" section). Didn't try it myself though, I don't send reports yet.
Hah, that makes it easy doesn’t it. I love rspamd - so glad I t
On 10/4/21 2:46 PM, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
It's YOU, GOOGLE, who made me that "low reputation" by consistently putting
my messages to spam. Now you are blocking me because of "low reputation"
that you made yourself.
Get a proper domain name perhaps?
Just throwing that out there.
I
I’ll throw my signature on something like this too, as a former DNSbl operator.
Just keep me in the loop.
It’s nice to see the community working together to deal with incidents as a
single voice. Shows that we still all have common goals even if we don’t
always see eye to eye on everything.
36 matches
Mail list logo
