Re: [mailop] SPF fragility vs. utility

2024-10-19 Thread Alessandro Vesely via mailop
On Fri 18/Oct/2024 19:33:41 +0200 Jaroslaw Rafa wrote: Dnia 18.10.2024 o godz. 14:24:05 Slavko via mailop pisze: Of course, and spammers would be stupid to not abuse the fact, that email client allow to setup to show display name without email address, with fallback to email, if there is no

Re: [mailop] SPF fragility vs. utility

2024-10-19 Thread Gellner, Oliver via mailop
> On 18.10.2024 at 17:08 Slavko via mailop wrote: > > Dňa 18. októbra 2024 14:38:42 UTC používateľ Bill Cole via mailop > napísal: >> On 2024-10-18 at 10:24:05 UTC-0400 (Fri, 18 Oct 2024 14:24:05 +) >> Slavko via mailop >> is rumored to have said: >> >> [...] >>> BTW, this ML is exact exa

Re: [mailop] Mimecast DKIM Sender Invalid

2024-10-19 Thread Andy Beverley - Simplelists via mailop
On 18/10/2024 06:47, Florian Effenberger via mailop wrote: So if that is the reason, the best option would be to ask the recipient in question to open a ticket. I might even be able to dig out our reference number if that would be helpful. That would be fantastic indeed! I am trying to get in

Re: [mailop] SPF fragility vs. utility

2024-10-19 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via mailop
> On 20 Oct 2024, at 7:09 AM, Gellner, Oliver via mailop > wrote: > > Apple Mail shows Reply-To headers. Not only by default, but always, you > cannot hide them. > The downside is that it does not show the email addresses but only the > display names, both for the From and the Reply-To headers

Re: [mailop] SPF fragility vs. utility

2024-10-19 Thread Graeme Fowler via mailop
Hello folks Could we keep the list on track please - mail operations, not browser choice, certificate errors, webserver response codes and so on. Thanks! Graeme ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop