On Fri 25/Aug/2023 17:36:06 +0200 Chris Adams via mailop wrote:
Once upon a time, Jaroslaw Rafa said:
Dnia 25.08.2023 o godz. 09:48:35 Chris Adams via mailop pisze:
So even for transactional messages, there's usually an account making
the purchase, or something is being delivered to an addre
> On 25.08.2023 at 13:29 Brotman, Alex via mailop wrote:
>
> Are you suggesting that an unsub results in a suppression? That hardly
> seems ideal. That seems to suggest I sign up for a brand's email list.
> Order some stuff, get receipt. Later unsub. Later buy again, but get no
> receipt
On Fri 25/Aug/2023 23:12:56 +0200 postfix wrote:
users either underuse, or overconsume. In both cases they are paying more than
what a market without subscription would do.
Aha, so that's why they tend to give the wrong address...
For comparison, the delivery address is wrong in rare cases,
Dňa 26. augusta 2023 11:29:34 UTC používateľ Alessandro Vesely via mailop
napísal:
>On Fri 25/Aug/2023 23:12:56 +0200 postfix wrote:
>> users either underuse, or overconsume. In both cases they are paying more
>> than what a market without subscription would do.
>
>Aha, so that's why they tend
Dnia 26.08.2023 o godz. 13:58:21 Slavko via mailop pisze:
>
> Or people simple do not want to share own email, as it is
> not related for delivery, but required by the form. Thus
> they fill semi random email like string.
In many cases either the correct email address OR a phone number is needed
On 8/26/23 06:58, Slavko via mailop wrote:
Or people simple do not want to share own email, as it is
not related for delivery, but required by the form. Thus
they fill semi random email like string.
That's what mailinator is for, or the temporary addresses offered by
several browser plugins,
I'm surprised that nobody has mentioned this here, because it was a big win for
Gmail plus has language which is applicable to any ISP.
In the order (in which the RNC complaint was dismissed) the court basically not
only smacked down the RNC, but made clear that the Communications Decency Act
BigTech is overflowing with extreme-leftist bias - especially with their
social media fact-checkers - and (to a lesser extent) this bias
overflows into their spam filtering and search results - HOWEVER - the
RNC and so many right-wing politicians are among the WORST to try such a
lawsuit becaus
That's been a lot of my finding as well. While I fully empathize with
efforts to tackle bias, spam from affiliates of the RNC is worse than
their counterparts. Mainstream bias is worse in the opposite direction,
spam is worse in this direction. It's quite fair to notice the flaws
from every
Maybe one of the reasons the right-side of the political spectrum are
more aggressive spammers, is that it's a knock-on effect from being
marginalized within mainstream channels and leftist BigTech platforms.
Maybe if it was a more level playing field they'd feel less inclined to
do so.
- ma
It appears that Mark E. Jeftovic via mailop said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Maybe one of the reasons the right-side of the political spectrum are
>more aggressive spammers, is that it's a knock-on effect from being
>marginalized within mainstream channels and leftist BigTech platforms.
>
>May
11 matches
Mail list logo
