On 26 Mar 2017 00:20:17 -
"John Levine" wrote:
> Of course. But the fraction of domains registered by natural people
> is quite low. And, of course, the claim that you need your own second
> level domain to communicate on the Internet is ridiculous.
Depends on the time horizon.
If I want
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017, at 13:03, Norbert Bollow wrote:
> On 26 Mar 2017 00:20:17 -
> "John Levine" wrote:
>
> > Of course. But the fraction of domains registered by natural people
> > is quite low. And, of course, the claim that you need your own second
> > level domain to communicate on the
In article <20170326220333.3c517c48@quill> you write:
>If I want to be able to give people information for being able to
>contact me via the Internet, so that I can have a reasonable expectation
>of being able to make sure that this will still work in 20 years
>(provided I am then still alive and h
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017, at 13:34, Neil Schwartzman wrote:
> *PLEASE JOIN THE ICANN GROUP* and help us fight back against people
> who are fighting *in favour* of crime.
Please also take the time to understand that your needs are not my
needs. I would be in favour of a WHOIS system that doesn't exp
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017, at 13:58, John Levine wrote:
> In article <20170326220333.3c517c48@quill> you write:
> >If I want to be able to give people information for being able to
> >contact me via the Internet, so that I can have a reasonable expectation
> >of being able to make sure that this will st
On 03/26/2017 01:58 PM, John Levine wrote:
But I can't help noticing that people keep trying to change the topic.
Not changing the topic, refuting your statement that no one needs their
own domain name to communicate on the Internet.
Once again, nobody* has a problem with privacy protection
John Levine said:
"The problem is that the pro-crime crowd keep demanding that all the rest be
anonymous or effectively anonymous, too."
Exactly!
Also, like some who are arguing against Neil Sw. on this, I too consider myself
to be a very strong privacy advocate too. However what we currently ha
On 26 Mar 2017 20:58:50 -
"John Levine" wrote:
> In article <20170326220333.3c517c48@quill> you write:
> >If I want to be able to give people information for being able to
> >contact me via the Internet, so that I can have a reasonable
> >expectation of being able to make sure that this will
I have a hotmail account that I opened in 2000
And yes, I do see the childish style of argument that you mention.
--srs
> On 27-Mar-2017, at 2:28 AM, John Levine wrote:
>
> But I can't help noticing that people keep trying to change the topic.
> Once again, nobody* has a problem with privacy
