[mailop] Help - Anyone know a GitHub People

Hello team, I am a postmaster of Netease Inc.(NASDAQ: NTES), we are a professional email service provider in China with domains 163.com, 126.com, yeah.net and etc. Recently we seems to miss a lot of GitHub emails(such as GitHub Reigister Verify Emails), as our logfiles tell, Github dose no

Re: [mailop] Help - Anyone know a GitHub People

Maybe they run into something like this? 220 126.com Anti-spam GT for Coremail System (126com[20140526]) EHLO Connection to 126mx02.mxmail.netease.com closed by foreign host. It takes a long time to get any reply... and then your sever simply closes the connection. And from a different sys

Re: [mailop] Help - Anyone know a GitHub People

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 07:17:56PM +0800, ?? wrote: > I am a postmaster of Netease Inc.(NASDAQ: NTES), we are a professional > email service provider in China with domains 163.com, 126.com, yeah.net > and etc. I can't speak for GitHub, but I've had most of those domains blacklisted for over a

Re: [mailop] Help - Anyone know a GitHub People

Responded Off list On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 5:25 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 07:17:56PM +0800, ?? wrote: > > I am a postmaster of Netease Inc.(NASDAQ: NTES), we are a professional > > email service provider in China with domains 163.com, 126.com, yeah.net > > and etc. >

Re: [mailop] Help - Anyone know a GitHub People

Well, This is not a friendly welcome... Please you have an opportunity to engage and get things fixed, so don't throw a ton of bricks on the first email. Thanks. On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 4:25 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 07:17:56PM +0800, ?? wrote: > > I am a postmast

[mailop] Very large spike in false positives with Microsoft domains

I wanted to see if other followers have heard any chatter about Microsoft incorrectly classifying hard bounces for other providers/customers. We've been trying to get to the root cause of why they could be creating so many false positives for our platform over the past few weeks. Final-Recipient:

Re: [mailop] Very large spike in false positives with Microsoft domains

You should have seen the last of, “Transaction Failed” at about 1pm last Thursday, Feb 18th. If you’ve seen it since, we need to see the whole bounce. As to the rest … I’d need to see some more explicit samples. “Redacted” is fine. But we need to know the banner you got when you connected, and as

Re: [mailop] Help - Anyone know a GitHub People

Don't respond to the troll. Others of us want to be able to send mail to Netease domains, so we're appreciative that there's somebody here now joining us. Cheers, Al -- Al Iverson www.aliverson.com (312)725-0130 On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Franck Martin via mailop wrote: > Well, > > This

Re: [mailop] Help - Anyone know a GitHub People

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:25:57AM -0800, Franck Martin via mailop wrote: > Please you have an opportunity to engage and get things fixed, so don't > throw a ton of bricks on the first email. I didn't throw *any* bricks. I gave a candid assessment of the situation. And while it would be nice to

Re: [mailop] Help - Anyone know a GitHub People

If you're the postmaster for 163.com can you please look at your NDR policies? I get NDRs daily from people forging from on my domain to 163.com users that don't exist. Sent from my mobile. Please excuse any unusual brevity or typos while I'm on the go. On 25 Fe

Re: [mailop] Help - Anyone know a GitHub People

Yeah I've just noticed this reply to the original. Blacklisting now too. Sent from my mobile. Please excuse any unusual brevity or typos while I'm on the go. > On 25 Feb 2016, at 11:29 PM, Rich Kulawiec wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 07:17:56PM +0800, ?? wrote: >> I am a postmaster

[mailop] Microsoft/GMail MX Priority Issues - mailop Digest, Vol 100, Issue 32

Hi there, not sure what the correct protocol for answering these things is, but here goes so at least you know it has been resolved. After looking at the logs myself from the shell of the Sophos UTM, the UTM was in fact Greylisting. Why Sophos did not originally spot this when I raised the ca

Re: [mailop] Microsoft/GMail MX Priority Issues - mailop Digest, Vol 100, Issue 32

I should point out that "typical" greylisting doesn't work well with Gmail, since there is no guarantee that the retries will be performed from the same IP address... in fact, the chances are really high that it's from a different one. By typical, I mean based on any tuple which includes IP. We w

Re: [mailop] Microsoft/GMail MX Priority Issues - mailop Digest, Vol 100, Issue 32

Hi Brandon, Does GMail publish a list of its outbound hosts/ranges some place to enable us to whitelist? Kind regards, Mike On 25 February 2016 at 23:30, Brandon Long via mailop wrote: > I should point out that "typical" greylisting doesn't work well with > Gmail, since there is no guarantee t

Re: [mailop] Microsoft/GMail MX Priority Issues - mailop Digest, Vol 100, Issue 32

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Mike Reed wrote: > Hi Brandon, > > Does GMail publish a list of its outbound hosts/ranges some place to enable > us to whitelist? https://support.google.com/a/answer/60764?hl=en SPF records are actually pretty useful for that, you can extract the outbound SMTP IP

Re: [mailop] Microsoft/GMail MX Priority Issues - mailop Digest, Vol 100, Issue 32

On 2016-02-25 15:30, Brandon Long via mailop wrote: I should point out that "typical" greylisting doesn't work well with Gmail, since there is no guarantee that the retries will be performed from the same IP address... in fact, the chances are really high that it's from a different one. By ty

Re: [mailop] Microsoft/GMail MX Priority Issues - mailop Digest, Vol 100, Issue 32

On 2016-02-25 15:53, Mike Reed wrote: Hi Brandon, Does GMail publish a list of its outbound hosts/ranges some place to enable us to whitelist? _spf.google.com.300 IN TXT "v=spf1 include:_netblocks.google.com include:_netblocks2.google.com include:_netblocks3.google.co

Re: [mailop] Microsoft/GMail MX Priority Issues - mailop Digest, Vol 100, Issue 32

On Feb 25, 2016 5:03 PM, "Dave Warren" wrote: > > On 2016-02-25 15:53, Mike Reed wrote: >> >> Hi Brandon, >> >> Does GMail publish a list of its outbound hosts/ranges some place to enable us to whitelist? >> > > _spf.google.com.300 IN TXT "v=spf1 include:_ netblocks.google.com

Re: [mailop] Help - Anyone know a GitHub People

Hi Geordie, Please send me some NDR message samples and we will look into it. To stop being forged, as we know, I‘d recommand again that you add SPF(with rejecting policy),DKIM or even DMARC. These DNS records would help our system to identify whether an email is forged or not. We discard f

Re: [mailop] Help - Anyone know a GitHub People

Greetings team, For Github contact issue - Thank you Franck et al very much for all your helps, if you have a contact at GitHub, please help to introduce:) For Netease spamming issue - Netease are having nearly 700 million users now, users send out all kinds of emails, a majority of them ar

Re: [mailop] Microsoft/GMail MX Priority Issues - mailop Digest, Vol 100, Issue 32

> Does GMail publish a list of its outbound hosts/ranges some place to enable > us to whitelist? We try to keep up to date on IPs from Google Mail (and of course others) at dnswl.org, and one important use case for this data is to skip greylisting for any of the IPs found there (regardless of

Re: [mailop] Help - Anyone know a GitHub People

I've personally found junping responsive to abuse issues and highly clued And he runs domains with a massive userbase plus that are heavily forged into spam as well Rich, you date back from the Morris worm days and I know you from the old spam-l in the late 90s - you always did like filtering r

Re: [mailop] Help - Anyone know a GitHub People

The closing of connections are strange, it could be due to the GFW or some networking problem. We published some MX-proxy servers oversea for domains 163.com,126.com,yeah.net,vip.163.com,vip.126.com,188.com,etc, such as: $ dig +short 163mx01.mxmail.netease.com. 220.181.14.143 220.181.14.