There's RFC 1855 of course: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855 , a memo which
"does not specify an Internet standard of any kind".
The one mention of bottom-posting is that you should include "summarize the
original at the top of the message" or "include just enough text of the
original to give
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015, at 18:47, b...@liddicott.com wrote:
> There's RFC 1855 of course: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855 , a memo
> which "does not specify an Internet standard of any kind".
> The one mention of bottom-posting is that you should include
> "summarize the original at the top of
On Tue 2015-Sep-08 06:45:55 +1000, Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015, at 04:39, Gary Baribault wrote:
On 07/09/15 02:31 PM, mikea wrote:
On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 02:10:48PM -0400, Gary Baribault wrote:
Whatever happened to postmas...@example.com?
First, it was a standard.
Second, it g
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 08:18:18AM -0700, Hugo Slabbert wrote:
> On Tue 2015-Sep-08 06:45:55 +1000, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 8, 2015, at 04:39, Gary Baribault wrote:
> >>On 07/09/15 02:31 PM, mikea wrote:
> >>>On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 02:10:48PM -0400, Gary Baribault wrote:
> Whateve
Straight from the proverbial horse's mouth (someone at MS), shared with
permission:
"We are migrating mailboxes from the current Hotmail/outlook.com infrastructure
over to Office 365. This means that migrated users have their mail hit
Hotmail's front end and then forwarded to Office 365 where i
So - that means the problems we are having will spread to hotmail?
On 09/08/15 10:03, Anne Mitchell wrote:
Straight from the proverbial horse's mouth (someone at MS), shared with
permission:
"We are migrating mailboxes from the current Hotmail/outlook.com infrastructure over to Office
365. Th
> On Sep 8, 2015, at 10:03 AM, Anne Mitchell wrote:
>
> Straight from the proverbial horse's mouth (someone at MS), shared with
> permission:
>
> "We are migrating mailboxes from the current Hotmail/outlook.com
> infrastructure over to Office 365. This means that migrated users have their
>
> On Sep 8, 2015, at 9:36 AM, mikea wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 08:18:18AM -0700, Hugo Slabbert wrote:
>> On Tue 2015-Sep-08 06:45:55 +1000, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015, at 04:39, Gary Baribault wrote:
On 07/09/15 02:31 PM, mikea wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at
I thought Hotmail.com and Outlook.com are the same beast?
--
Dave Warren
http://www.hireahit.com/
http://ca.linkedin.com/in/davejwarren
On 2015-09-08 12:42, Marc Perkel wrote:
So - that means the problems we are having will spread to hotmail?
On 09/08/15 10:03, Anne Mitchell wrote:
Straight fr
> On Sep 8, 2015, at 1:19 PM, Dave Warren wrote:
>
> I thought Hotmail.com and Outlook.com are the same beast?
Hotmail.com and Outlook.com are the same beast. Office 365 is Microsoft’s
hosted exchange product.
Hotmail/Outlook are the same infrastructure. Office 365 has its own
infrastructure
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015, at 06:47 PM, b...@liddicott.com wrote:
> Either way, top-posting is now the de-facto standard in the world, and if
> you go on about it you will just look like a curmudgeon. Wikipedia says:
I considered top posting to this thread, but in HTML.
() ascii ribbon campaign -
b...@liddicott.com wrote:
^^^ what a surprise...
>
>
>
> Either way, top-posting is now the de-facto standard in the world, and
> if you go on about it you will just look like a curmudgeon. Wikipedia
> says:
>
>
>
> > This widespread policy in business communication made bottom and
> inline
12 matches
Mail list logo
