> On Sep 8, 2015, at 9:36 AM, mikea <mi...@mikea.ath.cx> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 08:18:18AM -0700, Hugo Slabbert wrote: >> On Tue 2015-Sep-08 06:45:55 +1000, Bron Gondwana <br...@fastmail.fm> wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015, at 04:39, Gary Baribault wrote: >>>> On 07/09/15 02:31 PM, mikea wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 02:10:48PM -0400, Gary Baribault wrote: >>>>>> Whatever happened to postmas...@example.com? >>>>> First, it was a standard. >>>>> >>>>> Second, it got too much traffic. >>>> >>>> I get the too much traffic part, what's wrong with it being a standard? >>>> >>> How can you be a special snowflake and make your own stamp on the world if >>> you follow a standard? >>> >> >> As a numbered list of gripes/issues/concerns it doesn't make too much sense. >> As a chronology, though? >> >> "First, this happened (which was fine). >> Then, this happened (which sucked)." >> >> Perhaps mikea meant the latter. > > <cynical> > It's a standard, so they elect to not follow it. More the rule than the > exception nowadays w.r.t. standards, I fear. > > Second, it's a standard, so it gets too much mail, and they'd prefer not to > have to deal with even valid complaints, much less invalid complaints and > spam. > </cynical>
Postmaster isn’t really the place for deliverability issues, in my experience. The postmasters seem to be more about keeping the system up and running. Most bigger networks have dedicated filter staff that are separate from the postmaster team. It’s been years since I’ve had any response from postmaster@ other than “you need to go *here* for deliverability support. laura -- Having an Email Crisis? 800 823-9674 Laura Atkins Word to the Wise la...@wordtothewise.com (650) 437-0741 Email Delivery Blog: http://wordtothewise.com/blog _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop
