Re: [mailop] OutLook Feebback Systems, thoughts and suggestions

> On Mar 28, 2019, at 9:15 PM, Michael Peddemors wrote: > > About 6 months ago, we signed up for the Feedback loops for our own > email platform, and in that time probably had one legitimate report, and > several false positives, probably from user(s) clicking on the wrong > button on an email

Re: [mailop] OutLook Feebback Systems, thoughts and suggestions

March 28, 2019 2:41 PM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: Re: [mailop] OutLook Feebback Systems, thoughts and suggestions Not sure if I should rise to the 'flame bait', but frankly of course it is a choice.. non-essential logs first of all are not needed, and why would we put sensitive information

Re: [mailop] OutLook Feebback Systems, thoughts and suggestions

" Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool<http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=18275> ? -Original Message- From: mailop On Behalf Of Michael Peddemors Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 2:41 PM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: Re: [mailop] OutLook Feebback Systems, thou

Re: [mailop] OutLook Feebback Systems, thoughts and suggestions

Not sure if I should rise to the 'flame bait', but frankly of course it is a choice.. non-essential logs first of all are not needed, and why would we put sensitive information on someone else's cloud if we don't need to? But the point was, is the information relevant? In this age of data overload

Re: [mailop] OutLook Feebback Systems, thoughts and suggestions

I'd suggest if it's more than 24 hours old ... don't bother. And yeah, noted, I'll try and find someone I can suggest that to. Aloha, Michael. -- Michael J Wise Microsoft Corporation| Spam Analysis "Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed." Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool