On 30/10/2018 09:29, Noel Butler wrote:
> On 30/10/2018 03:18, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 29 Oct 2018, at 12:41, Jim Popovitch via mailop wrote:
>
> N.B. please don't CC me, I'm subscribed to the list.
> I normally wouldn't, but your posts all have this header:
>
> Reply-To: Jim Popovitch
>
> Per
On 30/10/2018 03:18, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 29 Oct 2018, at 12:41, Jim Popovitch via mailop wrote:
>
>> N.B. please don't CC me, I'm subscribed to the list.
>
> I normally wouldn't, but your posts all have this header:
>
> Reply-To: Jim Popovitch
>
> Perhaps that's being added by Mailman for s
On 29/10/2018 19:44, Frands Bjerring Hansen wrote:
> Noel,
>
> LE does not insist on certbot. They recommend it, and why wouldn't they? :)
>
> Use acme.sh instead if you are not able adhere to the requirements of
> Certbot. Acme.sh requires nothing but sh.
>
> Also, it seems like you did not
On Mon, 2018-10-29 at 13:18 -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 29 Oct 2018, at 12:41, Jim Popovitch via mailop wrote:
>
> > N.B. please don't CC me, I'm subscribed to the list.
>
> I normally wouldn't, but your posts all have this header:
>
> Reply-To: Jim Popovitch
>
> Perhaps that's being added
On 29 Oct 2018, at 12:41, Jim Popovitch via mailop wrote:
> N.B. please don't CC me, I'm subscribed to the list.
I normally wouldn't, but your posts all have this header:
Reply-To: Jim Popovitch
Perhaps that's being added by Mailman for some reason...
__
On Mon, 2018-10-29 at 12:32 -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 29 Oct 2018, at 10:40, Jim Popovitch via mailop wrote:
>
> > You allow nsupdate from your cgi/php/java enabled webserver(s)?
>
> My **what?*** Are you high? Do you mean to be insulting???
Of course not. I only asked a simple question. Yo
On 29 Oct 2018, at 10:40, Jim Popovitch via mailop wrote:
You allow nsupdate from your cgi/php/java enabled webserver(s)?
My **what?*** Are you high? Do you mean to be insulting???
But no, I don't run anything on my webserver that modifies its own DNS.
Although I would be vulnerable in theor
On 10/29/2018 11:48 AM, Jim Popovitch via mailop wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-10-29 at 11:31 -0400, Dave Brockman wrote:
>> On 10/29/2018 10:40 AM, Jim Popovitch via mailop wrote:
>>> You allow nsupdate from your cgi/php/java enabled webserver(s)?
>>>
>>> -Jim P.
>>
>> No, the whole point of using acme.
On Mon, 2018-10-29 at 11:31 -0400, Dave Brockman wrote:
> On 10/29/2018 10:40 AM, Jim Popovitch via mailop wrote:
> > You allow nsupdate from your cgi/php/java enabled webserver(s)?
> >
> > -Jim P.
>
> No, the whole point of using acme.sh and the nsupdate module is to
> avoid running a web serv
On 10/29/2018 10:40 AM, Jim Popovitch via mailop wrote:
> You allow nsupdate from your cgi/php/java enabled webserver(s)?
>
> -Jim P.
No, the whole point of using acme.sh and the nsupdate module is to avoid
running a web server. You can also run LE with a webserver that doesn't
support cgi, ph
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Mon, 2018-10-29 at 09:52 -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 29 Oct 2018, at 5:44, Frands Bjerring Hansen wrote:
>
> > Noel,
> >
> > LE does not insist on certbot. They recommend it, and why wouldn't
> > they? :)
> >
> > Use acme.sh instead if you
On 29 Oct 2018, at 5:44, Frands Bjerring Hansen wrote:
Noel,
LE does not insist on certbot. They recommend it, and why wouldn't
they? :)
Use acme.sh instead if you are not able adhere to the requirements of
Certbot. Acme.sh requires nothing but sh.
Also, it seems like you did not proper
From: mailop on behalf of Noel Butler
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2018 4:29 AM
To: mailop@mailop.org
Subject: Re: [mailop] Expires SSL cert for mailop
On 27/10/2018 04:40, Thomas Walter wrote:
Hey Mark,
On 26.10.18 17:34, Mark Milhollan wrote: Let's Encrypt changes little,
proc
Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Tylor Newman via mailop"
To: "Dave Warren" , mailop@mailop.org
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2018 7:22:45 AM
Subject: Re: [mailop] Expires SSL cert for mailop
Very well said, Dave.
I was going to send a mor
reason not to be using it.
Tylor Newman
Linux Systems Administrator
Email: <mailto:tylo...@tylor.me> tylo...@tylor.me
From: Dave Warren
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 11:26 PM
To: mailop@mailop.org
Subject: Re: [mailop] Expires SSL cert for mailop
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018, at
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018, at 19:29, Noel Butler wrote:
> Problem with letsencrypt is their preferred and insisted " certbot "
> - does not run (easily at least) on all flavours..> I gave up with it on
> slackware which is what my servers run, tried
> using Crypt::LE and voila instant success, it was p
On 27/10/2018 04:40, Thomas Walter wrote:
> Hey Mark,
>
> On 26.10.18 17:34, Mark Milhollan wrote:
>
>> Let's Encrypt changes little, processes can break whether they are
>> yearly, bi-yearly or monthly. Granted you'd think there would be
>> monitoring and then reasonably quick restoration.
Hey Mark,
On 26.10.18 17:34, Mark Milhollan wrote:
> Let's Encrypt changes little, processes can break whether they are
> yearly, bi-yearly or monthly. Granted you'd think there would be
> monitoring and then reasonably quick restoration.
Let's Encrypt automates the whole process and in case t
On Thu, 25 Oct 2018, Doug Barton wrote:
>In the age of Let's Encrypt expired TLS certs are a really bad look.
Let's Encrypt changes little, processes can break whether they are
yearly, bi-yearly or monthly. Granted you'd think there would be
monitoring and then reasonably quick restoration.
y, October 25, 2018 11:11:04 PM
Subject: Re: [mailop] Expires SSL cert for mailop
http://chilli.nosignal.org won't be using any cert (:
October 26, 2018 4:58 PM, "Doug Barton" wrote:
> Y'all might want to be aware that this issue is being discussed on the NANOG
>
http://chilli.nosignal.org won't be using any cert (:
October 26, 2018 4:58 PM, "Doug Barton" wrote:
> Y'all might want to be aware that this issue is being discussed on the NANOG
> list. In the age of
> Let's Encrypt expired TLS certs are a really bad look.
>
> On 9/12/18 6:24 AM, Matt Gilber
Y'all might want to be aware that this issue is being discussed on the
NANOG list. In the age of Let's Encrypt expired TLS certs are a really
bad look.
On 9/12/18 6:24 AM, Matt Gilbert via mailop wrote:
Hey gang,
I was showing mailop to a new member of my team, and when I went to show
them w
Perfect time to move to Let's Encrypt :D
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
Those errors have gotten so easy to ignore since you're going to have that
whenever you access any piece of infrastructure.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Boy_Who_Cried_Wolf
Server side, though, Let's Encrypt and be done.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest I
24 matches
Mail list logo