Re: [mailop] BTInternet delivery problems

2015-09-08 Thread Michelle Sullivan
b...@liddicott.com wrote: ^^^ what a surprise... > > > > Either way, top-posting is now the de-facto standard in the world, and > if you go on about it you will just look like a curmudgeon. Wikipedia > says: > > > > > This widespread policy in business communication made bottom and > inline

Re: [mailop] BTInternet delivery problems

2015-09-08 Thread Alfie John
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015, at 06:47 PM, b...@liddicott.com wrote: > Either way, top-posting is now the de-facto standard in the world, and if > you go on about it you will just look like a curmudgeon. Wikipedia says: I considered top posting to this thread, but in HTML. () ascii ribbon campaign -

Re: [mailop] BTInternet delivery problems

2015-09-08 Thread Laura Atkins
> On Sep 8, 2015, at 9:36 AM, mikea wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 08:18:18AM -0700, Hugo Slabbert wrote: >> On Tue 2015-Sep-08 06:45:55 +1000, Bron Gondwana wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015, at 04:39, Gary Baribault wrote: On 07/09/15 02:31 PM, mikea wrote: > On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at

Re: [mailop] BTInternet delivery problems

2015-09-08 Thread mikea
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 08:18:18AM -0700, Hugo Slabbert wrote: > On Tue 2015-Sep-08 06:45:55 +1000, Bron Gondwana wrote: > >On Tue, Sep 8, 2015, at 04:39, Gary Baribault wrote: > >>On 07/09/15 02:31 PM, mikea wrote: > >>>On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 02:10:48PM -0400, Gary Baribault wrote: > Whateve

Re: [mailop] BTInternet delivery problems

2015-09-08 Thread Hugo Slabbert
On Tue 2015-Sep-08 06:45:55 +1000, Bron Gondwana wrote: On Tue, Sep 8, 2015, at 04:39, Gary Baribault wrote: On 07/09/15 02:31 PM, mikea wrote: On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 02:10:48PM -0400, Gary Baribault wrote: Whatever happened to postmas...@example.com? First, it was a standard. Second, it g

Re: [mailop] BTInternet delivery problems

2015-09-08 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015, at 18:47, b...@liddicott.com wrote: > There's RFC 1855 of course: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855 , a memo > which "does not specify an Internet standard of any kind". > The one mention of bottom-posting is that you should include > "summarize the original at the top of

Re: [mailop] BTInternet delivery problems

2015-09-08 Thread ben
There's RFC 1855 of course: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855 , a memo which "does not specify an Internet standard of any kind". The one mention of bottom-posting is that you should include "summarize the original at the top of the message" or "include just enough text of the original to give

Re: [mailop] BTInternet delivery problems

2015-09-07 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
> On 08-Sep-2015, at 2:15 am, Bron Gondwana wrote: > > How can you be a special snowflake and make your own stamp on the world if > you follow a standard? > > Bron ( responding to a top post with a standard form of quoting... ) The top posting, bottom posting and interleaved quoting camps need

Re: [mailop] BTInternet delivery problems

2015-09-07 Thread Michelle Sullivan
Gary Baribault wrote: > Whatever happened to postmas...@example.com? > > Hate to say it but Frank did say 'NOC email' ... rather than postmaster... well actaully didn't hate to say it, thought it might bring a smile ;-) Michelle > Gary B > > > On 07/09/15 01:53 PM, Frank Bulk wrote: > >>

Re: [mailop] BTInternet delivery problems

2015-09-07 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015, at 04:39, Gary Baribault wrote: > I get the too much traffic part, what's wrong with it being a standard? How can you be a special snowflake and make your own stamp on the world if you follow a standard? Bron ( responding to a top post with a standard form of quoting... ) --

Re: [mailop] BTInternet delivery problems

2015-09-07 Thread Bron Gondwana
Thanks Frank, I'll forward the email that I sent to postmaster@[example.com] to there. (obviously, I sent it from another mail provider. It is somewhat hard to email about SMTP deliverability problems without one of those) Bron. On Tue, Sep 8, 2015, at 03:53, Frank Bulk wrote: > You could try

Re: [mailop] BTInternet delivery problems

2015-09-07 Thread Gary Baribault
I get the too much traffic part, what's wrong with it being a standard? Gary B On 07/09/15 02:31 PM, mikea wrote: > On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 02:10:48PM -0400, Gary Baribault wrote: >> Whatever happened to postmas...@example.com? > First, it was a standard. > > Second, it got too much traffic. >

Re: [mailop] BTInternet delivery problems

2015-09-07 Thread mikea
On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 02:10:48PM -0400, Gary Baribault wrote: > Whatever happened to postmas...@example.com? First, it was a standard. Second, it got too much traffic. -- Mike Andrews, W5EGO mi...@mikea.ath.cx Tired old sysadmin ___ mailop maili

Re: [mailop] BTInternet delivery problems

2015-09-07 Thread Gary Baribault
Whatever happened to postmas...@example.com? Gary B On 07/09/15 01:53 PM, Frank Bulk wrote: > You could try the generic NOC email address, ipmc24hrsurveillanced...@bt.com > > Frank > > -Original Message- > From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Bron Gondwana > Sent:

Re: [mailop] BTInternet delivery problems

2015-09-07 Thread Frank Bulk
You could try the generic NOC email address, ipmc24hrsurveillanced...@bt.com Frank -Original Message- From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Bron Gondwana Sent: Monday, September 07, 2015 7:22 AM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: [mailop] BTInternet delivery problems W