On 12/12/24 16:44, Scott Q. wrote:
I understood that. You temp block the MS IP that shows high failure rate, which
may or may not be warranted.
No. I'm blocking the accounts, not the IPs. I won't block an IP that is clearly
authenticating on compromised accounts.
My fault for the misunderst
I understood that. You temp block the MS IP that shows high
failure rate, which may or may not be warranted.
My question was more along the lines of: by allowing MS IPs to mask
the user's true identity, how can you identify when a mailbox has been
compromised ?
Thanks,
Scott
On Thursday, 12/1
On 12/12/24 16:19, Scott Q. wrote:
How can you tell if they are compromised if legitimate user A connects from
France via 'New' Outlook and hacker B connects from Australia via 'New' Outlook ?
I'm afraid you misunderstood my previous answers. When an IP is behaving like :
IP 4.233.216.98 (8075
How can you tell if they are compromised if legitimate user A
connects from France via 'New' Outlook and hacker B connects from
Australia via 'New' Outlook ?
Scott
On Thursday, 12/12/2024 at 09:25 Francois Petillon via mailop wrote:
On 12/12/24 14:52, Scott Q. wrote:
> So are you guys blockin
On 12/12/24 14:52, Scott Q. wrote:
So are you guys blocking the connections from the MS ASN ? Does that result in
'New' Outlook not being able to login at all or not ?
No, we disable accounts when the credentials seem to be compromised.
François
___
So are you guys blocking the connections from the MS ASN ? Does
that result in 'New' Outlook not being able to login at all or not ?
Scott
On Thursday, 12/12/2024 at 05:37 Francois Petillon via mailop wrote:
On 12/11/24 17:19, Scott Q. via mailop wrote:
> It seems MS is pushing really hard fo
On 12/11/24 17:19, Scott Q. via mailop wrote:
It seems MS is pushing really hard for the 'NEW' Outlook
adoption. This software, along with Outlook Mobile and myMail
(mail.ru), etc, cache logon information on their own infrastructure
and then basically proxy the connection to the service provider.
Hi Yuval,
I don't think it's that straightforward, or maybe I don't know enough
about the legal aspects of it all. I know there are other lawyers on
the list, maybe they can chime in as well.
All I know is that the EU has, like others, disabled the access of
Outlook Mobile (and 'New' Outlook as w
FYI - The 'S' in 'Outlook' stands for 'Security'.
-A
On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 8:29 AM Scott Q. via mailop
wrote:
> It seems MS is pushing really hard for the 'NEW' Outlook adoption. This
> software, along with Outlook Mobile and myMail (mail.ru), etc, cache
> logon information on their own infra
On 2024-12-11 15:11, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:
On 2024-12-11 11:20, Scott Q. via mailop wrote:
I find that beyond the :
- security risks
- privacy concerns
- inability to troubleshoot connection issues
- being exposed to MS outages
- inability to optimize routing for global customers
On 2024-12-11 11:20, Scott Q. via mailop wrote:
I find that beyond the :
- security risks
- privacy concerns
- inability to troubleshoot connection issues
- being exposed to MS outages
- inability to optimize routing for global customers
there is also the glaring fact that MS is a competitor i
Opinions are like arseholes, Graeme, everyone has one.
Pete.
> On 11 Dec 2024, at 17:21, Graeme Fowler via mailop wrote:
>
> Evening folks
>
> Small admin nit follows.
>
> On 11 Dec 2024, at 16:51, Marco Moock via mailop wrote:
>> MS's slaves love that like they love any other privacy or s
Am 11.12.2024 um 14:20:32 Uhr schrieb Scott Q. via mailop:
> The whole thing seems very anti-competitive to me.
It is and this is maybe intended.
Big companies want to gain more marketshare and make people use more of
their services.
Just think about how many domains now use MS or Google in thei
I find that beyond the :
- security risks
- privacy concerns
- inability to troubleshoot connection issues
- being exposed to MS outages
- inability to optimize routing for global customers
there is also the glaring fact that MS is a competitor in this space.
What stops them 12 months from now f
Evening folks
Small admin nit follows.
On 11 Dec 2024, at 16:51, Marco Moock via mailop wrote:
> MS's slaves love that like they love any other privacy or security
> violations by the big tech crap companies.
I’m not singling you out, Marco, this applies to everyone...
Please try to be a littl
A local University here in Germany blocks the use of the new Outlook. This results in the Error "wrong credentials".They provide a Registry Key to turn back to the Outlook (classic).https://www.itsb.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/aktuelles/meldung00324.html (Post in German)Several other Universities published
You'll find this thread from a year ago interesting, I gave my insights there:
https://list.mailop.org/private/mailop/2023-November/thread.html#26357
Groetjes,
Louis
On Wednesday, December 11, 2024 5:19 PM, Scott Q. via mailop
wrote:
> It seems MS is pushing really hard for the 'NEW' Outlook
Am 11.12.2024 um 11:19:58 Uhr schrieb Scott Q. via mailop:
> It seems MS is pushing really hard for the 'NEW' Outlook
> adoption.
MS's slaves love that like they love any other privacy or security
violations by the big tech crap companies.
> This software, along with Outlook Mobile and myMail (m
It seems MS is pushing really hard for the 'NEW' Outlook
adoption. This software, along with Outlook Mobile and myMail
(mail.ru), etc, cache logon information on their own infrastructure
and then basically proxy the connection to the service provider. This
makes it impossible for service providers
19 matches
Mail list logo
