On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 11:24:31 -0500, John Possidente
wrote:
>Perhaps a forlorn hope: is there a list somewhere of the meanings for the
>AUP#I- error codes?
I stumbled across the postmaster page at TWC (I have conveniently forgotten
the URi) which had a comprehensive-looking list. The message
Perhaps a forlorn hope: is there a list somewhere of the meanings for the
AUP#I- error codes?
Thanks,
John
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Mark Dale wrote:
>
> Ditto on MDR's comment. I'm also seeing mail happily received at TWC
> addresses. Thanks again Scott.
>
>
> =
Ditto on MDR's comment. I'm also seeing mail happily received at TWC
addresses. Thanks again Scott.
On 19/12/17 03:10, Michael Rathbun wrote:
Issue appears to be resolved. Thanks much.
mdr
___
mailo
Glad to hear that. Thank you for sharing. It is not always easy to
tell what is going on from the outside.
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Scott Undercofler wrote:
> Yes. We are much smarter than that.
>
>
>> On Dec 18, 2017, at 7:38 AM, Charles McKean
>> wrote:
>>
>> Or, perhaps TWC has made
On 12/17/17 5:13 PM, Andrew Barrett wrote:
I'm guessing that, like everyone else, TWC is just getting slammed with
mail sent by ESPs for senders with holiday offers and the like
Which means that like everyone else, TWC's customers are just getting
slammed with mail sent by ESPs for sender
On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 08:28:21 -0700, Scott Undercofler
wrote:
>Yes. We are much smarter than that.
Issue appears to be resolved. Thanks much.
mdr
--
"Honest folk do not wear masks when they enter a bank."
-- Unspiek, Baron Bodissey
Yes. We are much smarter than that.
> On Dec 18, 2017, at 7:38 AM, Charles McKean
> wrote:
>
> Or, perhaps TWC has made the very questionable choice to implement
> SORBS on a real ISP mail server. That would be one way to hold down
> load. Just randomly block a whole bunch of IP addresses tha
On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 09:38:22 -0500, Charles McKean
wrote:
>Or, perhaps TWC has made the very questionable choice to implement
>SORBS on a real ISP mail server. That would be one way to hold down
>load. Just randomly block a whole bunch of IP addresses that aren't
>actually spam sources.
>
>The pe
Or, perhaps TWC has made the very questionable choice to implement
SORBS on a real ISP mail server. That would be one way to hold down
load. Just randomly block a whole bunch of IP addresses that aren't
actually spam sources.
The people at TWC are smarter than this, yes? Please tell me it isn't so
Between outlook and .nl and .eu, we have been hammering away at spam the last
few weeks so some senders have been, perhaps unfairly, caught up in the net. We
weathered the holiday mail really well but have been pretty harsh on snowshoers
and hit and run spammers.
> On Dec 17, 2017, at 6:13 PM,
I'm guessing that, like everyone else, TWC is just getting slammed with
mail sent by ESPs for senders with holiday offers and the like, and is
just not as well equipped to handle it. Seems like every holiday season
brings new record volumes.
On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Michael Rathbun wrote
On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 08:57:34 +1100, Mark Dale wrote:
>Is it just us or are others experiencing this?
>
>Any clues as to why would be greatly appreciated.
We're seeing it, with a sudden onset on the 14th. The IPs send requested
and/or transactional email, have excellent reputations, and are blo
Hi Scott,
I had missed that. Just saw that SORBS have blacklisted the server.
Thanks,
Mark
On 18/12/17 09:36, Scott Undercofler wrote:
1010 is blacklisted. What ip space are you coming from?
On Dec 17, 2017, at 2:57 PM, Mark Dale wrote:
Hi All,
We've recently started seeing mail get
1010 is blacklisted. What ip space are you coming from?
> On Dec 17, 2017, at 2:57 PM, Mark Dale wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> We've recently started seeing mail get rejected ("deferred") by TWC.
>
> An example error message in the mail log:
>
> Dec 17 22:38:39 bissen postfix/smtp[27323]: 7ADBC2E85
Hi All,
We've recently started seeing mail get rejected ("deferred") by TWC.
An example error message in the mail log:
Dec 17 22:38:39 bissen postfix/smtp[27323]: 7ADBC2E851:
to=,
relay=dnvrco-cmedge02.email.rr.com[69.134.155.136]:25, delay=11160,
delays=11159/0.12/0.88/0, dsn=4.0.0, status=
15 matches
Mail list logo
