On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 09:38:22 -0500, Charles McKean
<charles.mckean.ml...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Or, perhaps TWC has made the very questionable choice to implement
>SORBS on a real ISP mail server. That would be one way to hold down
>load. Just randomly block a whole bunch of IP addresses that aren't
>actually spam sources.
>
>The people at TWC are smarter than this, yes? Please tell me it isn't so.
In our case, there is no SORBS listing (or any other sort of listing), The
SMTP response lacks the usual 5.n.n code, includes a host name, and cites an
undocumented "AUP" code.
mdr
--
...right, as the world goes,
is only in question between equals in power,
while the strong do what they can
and the weak suffer what they must.
-- Thucydides, History of the Peloponnesian War
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
