Dňa 5. decembra 2022 21:57:42 UTC používateľ "Gellner, Oliver via mailop"
napísal:
>The reason for this might be that most report addresses are parsed by scripts,
>not read by humans, and the scripts aren’t subsceptible to buy the advertised
>products. The spammers would need to create spam co
> Am 05.12.2022 um 15:15 schrieb Slavko via mailop :
>
> Yes, now i understand, thanks. I am surprised, that i don't see any
> SPAM on DMARC/TLS reports addresses and they are published
> about one year for TLS and for DMARC even longer.
The reason for this might be that most report addresses are
Dňa 5. decembra 2022 10:21:45 UTC používateľ Alessandro Vesely via mailop
napísal:
>Useless TLSRPT messages report successful connections only.
Yes, now i understand, thanks. I am surprised, that i don't see any
SPAM on DMARC/TLS reports addresses and they are published
about one year for TLS a
On Sun 04/Dec/2022 19:17:39 +0100 Slavko via mailop wrote:
Dňa 4. decembra 2022 12:30:25 UTC používateľ Alessandro Vesely via mailop
napísal:
So useful that I decided to share the script I use to discriminate useful from
useless reports.
Can you please be more verbose in what you see these
Dňa 4. decembra 2022 12:30:25 UTC používateľ Alessandro Vesely via mailop
napísal:
>So useful that I decided to share the script I use to discriminate useful from
>useless reports.
Can you please be more verbose in what you see these reports useful
and which and why you consider some as useles
When I set up the DNS record to enable TLS reporting, I thought it would be
somewhat useless. Instead, I keep getting useful advice from Google. So
useful that I decided to share the script I use to discriminate useful from
useless reports.
Here it is:
https://www.tana.it/sw/tlsrpt/
Best
A
