Yeah, thanks. Those were what I was wondering whether they had happened again.
--srs
> On 02-Apr-2015, at 11:30 pm, John Levine wrote:
>
> There were some surprising (and I think rather ill-informed) objectsions when
> we did last call on the nullmx draft, but they were resolved long ago.
In article you write:
>Out of curiosity, which catch 22 references? I contributed a bit to that
>draft back in the day.
There's a new 5xx code for servers that reject mail due to the reverse path
being nullmx. It's defined in a draft that just got out of last call yesterday
so whould go to the
Subject: Re: [mailop] SPF for domains that don't send e-mail
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote:
On the note of trying to be a good netzin, should I publish a SPF
record for a domain that should never be used to send e-mail?
Would "v=spf1 -all" cause milter
Out of curiosity, which catch 22 references? I contributed a bit to that draft
back in the day.
--srs
> On 02-Apr-2015, at 8:43 pm, Kurt Andersen (b) wrote:
>
> APPSWG is working on getting it accepted. There have been some Catch-22
> references that needed to get sorted out.
__
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian
wrote:
> And if you don't want to receive mail on that domain either ..
>
> example.com.MX 0 .
>
> Yeah, mx zero dot.
>
> There's an old rfc that never got beyond draft stage that explains it all,
> but rfc or no rfc, it works fine.
>
And if you don't want to receive mail on that domain either ..
example.com.MX 0 .
Yeah, mx zero dot.
There's an old rfc that never got beyond draft stage that explains it all, but
rfc or no rfc, it works fine.
--srs
> On 02-Apr-2015, at 7:57 pm, Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote:
>
> On the n
Yes.
Aloha,
Michael.
--
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Aaron C. de Bruyn<mailto:aa...@heyaaron.com>
Sent: 4/2/2015 7:36 AM
To: mailop@mailop.org<mailto:mailop@mailop.org>
Subject: [mailop] SPF for domains that don't send e-mail
On the note
That's a *great* document. It even answered my question about abuse@.
Thanks for the pointer.
-A
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Kurt Andersen (b) wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Aaron C. de Bruyn
> wrote:
>>
>> On the note of trying to be a good netzin, should I publish a SPF
>> rec
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Aaron C. de Bruyn
wrote:
> On the note of trying to be a good netzin, should I publish a SPF
> record for a domain that should never be used to send e-mail?
>
> Would "v=spf1 -all" cause milters to reject all mail from the domain?
>
Referring to the M3AAWG BCP for
On the note of trying to be a good netzin, should I publish a SPF
record for a domain that should never be used to send e-mail?
Would "v=spf1 -all" cause milters to reject all mail from the domain?
-A
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
http://ch
10 matches
Mail list logo
