In article <f7f954ac-937a-47a4-8d46-00277a3a0...@gmail.com> you write: >Out of curiosity, which catch 22 references? I contributed a bit to that >draft back in the day.
There's a new 5xx code for servers that reject mail due to the reverse path being nullmx. It's defined in a draft that just got out of last call yesterday so whould go to the RFC editor in the next week or so. There's nothing contentious, it's just people are busy and it wasn't at the top of the list. There were some surprising (and I think rather ill-informed) objectsions when we did last call on the nullmx draft, but they were resolved long ago. > >--srs > >> On 02-Apr-2015, at 8:43 pm, Kurt Andersen (b) <kb...@drkurt.com> wrote: >> >> APPSWG is working on getting it accepted. There have been some Catch-22 >> references that needed to get sorted out. > >_______________________________________________ >mailop mailing list >mailop@mailop.org >http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop > _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop
