> On 25 Sep 2015, at 01:01, Michael Peddemors wrote:
>
> On 15-09-24 04:49 PM, Hal Murray wrote:
>> How many of the bulk mail senders would cooperate? Would they be willing to
>> switch all their customers to real opt-in?
>
> Called 'confirmed double opt-in', and I think everyone wishes they w
On 15-09-24 04:49 PM, Hal Murray wrote:
How many of the bulk mail senders would cooperate? Would they be willing to
switch all their customers to real opt-in?
Called 'confirmed double opt-in', and I think everyone wishes they would
:) Also very interesting studies on conversion rates for con
> At some point, perhaps the mail server infrastructure needs to manage
> sub/unsub events, and enforce them?
The technical side doesn't seem too hard, but the political side would
probably be "interesting".
What fraction of lists/traffic is currently not explicit opt-in? The case I
see is ge