Re: [mailop] Mail servers tracking list substrictions

2015-09-28 Thread Ian Eiloart
> On 25 Sep 2015, at 01:01, Michael Peddemors wrote: > > On 15-09-24 04:49 PM, Hal Murray wrote: >> How many of the bulk mail senders would cooperate? Would they be willing to >> switch all their customers to real opt-in? > > Called 'confirmed double opt-in', and I think everyone wishes they w

Re: [mailop] Mail servers tracking list substrictions

2015-09-24 Thread Michael Peddemors
On 15-09-24 04:49 PM, Hal Murray wrote: How many of the bulk mail senders would cooperate? Would they be willing to switch all their customers to real opt-in? Called 'confirmed double opt-in', and I think everyone wishes they would :) Also very interesting studies on conversion rates for con

[mailop] Mail servers tracking list substrictions

2015-09-24 Thread Hal Murray
> At some point, perhaps the mail server infrastructure needs to manage > sub/unsub events, and enforce them? The technical side doesn't seem too hard, but the political side would probably be "interesting". What fraction of lists/traffic is currently not explicit opt-in? The case I see is ge