On Mon, May 1, 2017, at 22:07, Carl Byington wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On Sat, 2017-04-29 at 00:01 -0700, Mark Milhollan wrote:
> > But some have an X-Forefront-Antispam-Report header with SFV:SPM which
> > has been said is their indicator of a message they con
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sat, 2017-04-29 at 00:01 -0700, Mark Milhollan wrote:
> But some have an X-Forefront-Antispam-Report header with SFV:SPM which
> has been said is their indicator of a message they consider to be
> SPAM.
Yes, and we take MS at their word, and via
In my opinion doing antispam in the outgoing is harder.
- First because definition of spam depends on what the *recipient* wants
and you have much less feedback from those recipients when you are on the
sending side.
- Second because you get paid from the one sending (or from advertisers
showing th
We periodically receive SPAM from outbound.protection.outlook.com hosts.
No worry, they can slip through anyone's filters. But some have an
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report header with SFV:SPM which has been said is
their indicator of a message they consider to be SPAM. How MS handles
them is up
