On Mon, May 1, 2017, at 22:07, Carl Byington wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > On Sat, 2017-04-29 at 00:01 -0700, Mark Milhollan wrote: > > But some have an X-Forefront-Antispam-Report header with SFV:SPM which > > has been said is their indicator of a message they consider to be > > SPAM. > > Yes, and we take MS at their word, and via SA flatly reject such > messages (at least for users that have spam filtering contexts that > include our standard SA setup).
I've been quarantining the mail for over a year and cannot find any case where the message was actively released by the user (or administrator), so whatever they are doing it does seem to be effective. At this point it's a guarantee quarantine, but separately it is weighted high enough that most such mail will ultimately get rejected if it has even the slightest bit of bad odour. _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
