On 2021-12-30 11:00, Nicolas JEAN via mailop wrote:
Il 29/12/2021 07:05, Slavko via mailop ha scritto:
I am not sure if that matters. IMO , when dovecot's auth policy will
reject the later (with real RIP), the roundcube's content will be
empty
(at least i hope), and client's IP will be blocked
On 2021-09-07 14:20, John Levine wrote:
It appears that John Capo via mailop said:
The only IPv6 issues I have seen, other than transit only via HE, is
delivering to Google. Google seems to assume that mail via IPv6 is
spam.
The same mail flow via IPv4 is OK with Google. Proper DNS and
On 2021-09-06 23:58, Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
On 2021-09-07 08:54:51 (+0800), Andre van Eyssen via mailop wrote:
On Tue, 7 Sep 2021, Neil Jenkins via mailop wrote:
Obviously I'm biased, but our service Fastmail sounds exactly like
what you are looking
for. We have setup wizards for cust
On 2021-07-19 19:27, Ken Johnson via mailop wrote:
An email I tried to send there returned with:
: host
al-ip4-mx-vip2.prodigy.net[144.160.235.144]
said: 550 5.7.1 Connections not accepted from servers without a
valid
sender domain.alph752 Fix reverse DNS for 173.228.157.53 (in reply
On 2021-06-22 04:08, Joel Golliet via mailop wrote:
Hi everyone and outlook/hotmail team especially
We can't get our IP address data from the SNDS since June 17th.
I think we are not the only ones (?).
Same here.
John Capo
Soon to re-retire and go sailing
__
On Thu, April 8, 2021 05:38, Lukas Tribus via mailop wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 10:27, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Dnia 7.04.2021 o godz. 17:26:45 John Capo via mailop pisze:
>>
>>>
>>> These are the same folks that required that r
On 2021-04-07 11:09, John Levine via mailop wrote:
It appears that Laura Atkins via mailop said:
Forcing alignment across all 3 entities (5321.from, 5322.from and the
d=) breaks a lot of current implementations. Many ESPs and a ton of
small businesses
are going to be scrambling to get this
On Sat, April 3, 2021 11:59, Jim Popovitch via mailop wrote:
> Paging someone from Barracuda or EmailReg. EmailReg.org has been
> offline for a while now.
A year at least, maybe more.
John Capo
>
> https://www.barracudacentral.org/about/emailreg
>
>
> -Jim P.
>
>
> _
On Thu, February 25, 2021 03:41, Ignacio García via mailop wrote:
>
> I know OVH's not a favorite among pros, but for me, their dedicated
> servers work well and aren't very expensive. Can anybody recommend a
> somewhat similar solution
> with a better IP segments reputation?
Vultr.com blocks po
On Tue, December 15, 2020 16:36, William Kern via mailop wrote:
> Our customers are beginning to see these today.
It seems to come in bursts. We are ignoring the 550 and queuing. Earlier
nothing was queued and now about 500 messages are in the queue but some new
mail is being accepted.
John Ca
On Thu, November 19, 2020 09:47, Al Iverson via mailop wrote:
> Test forcing your MTA to send to Gmail over IPv4 instead of IPv6.
> Gmail's filtering is much more harsh on IPv6. This has actually bit me
> before in the past.
!00% agree. Easy to do with Postfix and probably other MTAs.
John Capo
T
On Fri, October 9, 2020 17:15, Cameron Henry via mailop wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
> I just wanted to check if there is anyone from Optimum online in these
> threads, or if anyone has
> a good contact there for some help with some blocks.
Good luck. I've been trying for 18 months. Please share if you
On Fri, October 9, 2020 10:44, Stefano Bagnara via mailop wrote:
> for the past 3 days SNDS show "No data for specified IPs on this date": does
> it work for you? (I
> can see data for the previous days)
Ditto.
John Capo
Tuffmail.com
___
mailop maili
On Wed, June 10, 2020 10:26, Brett Schenker via mailop wrote:
> We've been having some issues delivering to optonline, is there anyone from
> there on here or anyone have suggestions on how to reach them?
If you do manage to reach someone please post an update.
John Capo
Tuffmail.com
>
> --
> Br
On Tue, June 9, 2020 08:30, Jon Morby \(Fido\) via mailop wrote:
> Well they've responded, but weren't very helpful ... I don't think they
> see a problem :(
I don't doubt that. They blocked my new IP space because my unassigned,
unused, not pingable, nobody home yet addresses did not have a rev
Hello,
We are moving into new address space and it seems to be blocked by
optimum.net. The usual contact point does not work.
550 5.1.1 Invalid recipient postmas...@optimum.net
Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients:
Recipient address: supp...@optimum.net
Reason:
On Mon, April 22, 2019 11:31, John Leslie wrote:
> I got a surprise trying to confirm a dental appointment
>
>
> status=SOFTBOUNCE (host alt2.aspmx.l.google.com[172.217.192.26] said:
> 550-5.7.1 This message does
> not have authentication information or fails to pass 550-5.7.1 authentication
> ch
On Wed, March 6, 2019 12:22, Brian Kowalewicz wrote:
> Anyone from virginmedia.com around? If so, could you reach out off list?
> Having some delivery
> issues.
Busted Greylising perhaps?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Brian Kowalewicz
> Postmaster, Hostopia.com
> bkowalew...@hostopia.com
>
>
___
18 matches
Mail list logo
