I'm tying into your "King Trump" reply but without trying to
start a political debate.
Don't you think that democracy itself has its own weaknesses ? A
benevolent ruler can be much more efficient than what we have now in
much of the world, including democracies. There have been some cases
in histo
The IETF runs a lot of mailing lists, which I think many of us subscribe to.
The mail
will shortly be moving to a new server at Panix in New York, both the mailing
lists
and the transaction-like mail about the status of documents and such. It's not
like
a giant ESP, but the overall volume is o
The root cause of this was that earlier memos under prior policy went to
department heads to be distributed to teams. Some of those heads “softened”
some of the messaging and King Trump didn’t like that. So they brought in a
server specifically to bypass the supervisory oversight.
Stuff is abo
On Wed, 29 Jan 2025, Scott Q. via mailop wrote:
Guessing this ?
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/trump-administration-tests-power-email-every-federal-employee-rcna189126
So Federal employees aren't using a Federal-provided email address for
work emails ?
Oh sorry, is it only pol
On Wed 29/Jan/2025 15:41:06 +0100 ismael tanguy wrote:
On incoming layer, saying I create an Authentication-Results header and
base a first ARC Set Then, email travels through infra and can be
eventually forwarded to outside (redirection, responder, mailinglist).
This ARC set is noisy and u
Hello
I have a question about the relation between Authentication-Results and
ARC Set.
I hope this is the good place to ask
In RFC8617, it is written (part2.4: Validation of Chain of Custody)
Any ARC-enabled Internet Mail Handler can validate the entire set of
custody and the authentica
On 29/01/2025 14:46, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via mailop wrote:
Is there any kind of DNS error that could cause this?
There was a bug in c-ares recently that caused this in some rare cases.
https://github.com/c-ares/c-ares/issues/757
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 01:46:59PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via mailop
wrote:
> > On 2025/01/28 16:55, Fehlauer, Norbert via mailop wrote:
> > > if a domain has no mx record than a fallback to A/ for the
> > > domain is possible. Is this fallback only to happen when no mx
> > > record e
On 2025/01/28 16:55, Fehlauer, Norbert via mailop wrote:
if a domain has no mx record than a fallback to A/ for the domain is
possible. Is this fallback only to happen when no mx record exists for
the domain or can this fallback happen when no connection to the mx
defined servers is possib
I was thinking thishttps://letsencrypt.org/2025/01/22/ending-expiration-emails/Sent from my iPhoneOn Jan 29, 2025, at 8:46 AM, Scott Q. via mailop wrote:
Guessing this ?https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/trump-administration-tests-power-email-every-federal-employee-rcna189126On We
10 matches
Mail list logo
