On 22Nov24, John Levine apparently wrote:
> You can make the problem a lot easier by putting each message in a different
> file like Maildir
For the mail payload sure, Maildir offers a likely unique ID for storage, but
it doesn't
really help much with metadata or for syncing and resolving mailbo
I was actually thinking more in line with LiberationTech from Stanford:
https://lists.ghserv.net/mailman/listinfo/lt
It’s not a prime concern of MailOps that’s for sure. It’s definitely going to
come up again and again.
Ladar Levison’s Dark Mail sort of disappeared as well, so I’m not sure what’s
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 23, 2024 at 12:16:55AM +0100, Philipp Kern via mailop wrote:
> On 11/22/24 8:37 PM, Miles Fidelman via mailop wrote:
> > So, one answer to my problem is just to set up a copy of sendmail with
> > local delivery to an IPFS file. But, that leads me to wonder if anybody
> > is offeri
It appears that Mark Delany via mailop said:
>On 22Nov24, Eric Tykwinski via mailop apparently wrote:
>> Here’s the thing that confuses me, and perhaps because I don’t know
>> Interplanetary File System as much as I should.
>> You have /var/spool/mail/user which changes every time you receive/del
On 11/22/24 8:37 PM, Miles Fidelman via mailop wrote:
> So, one answer to my problem is just to set up a copy of sendmail with
> local delivery to an IPFS file. But, that leads me to wonder if anybody
> is offering mail-gateways as a service - be they free gateways or paid?
Isn't that everyone wh
On 22Nov24, Eric Tykwinski via mailop apparently wrote:
> Here’s the thing that confuses me, and perhaps because I don’t know
> Interplanetary File System as much as I should.
> You have /var/spool/mail/user which changes every time you receive/delete a
> message, and that changes the hash/CID wh
Here’s the thing that confuses me, and perhaps because I don’t know
Interplanetary File System as much as I should.
You have /var/spool/mail/user which changes every time you receive/delete a
message, and that changes the hash/CID which I’m assuming will replicate to
other distributed systems on
Do you need a gateway to receive email? Send email? Both?
Le ven. 22 nov. 2024 à 20:42, Miles Fidelman via mailop
a écrit :
> Hi Folks,
>
> Apropos my earlier question of funneling mail to a server that doesn't
> have a fixed IP address. It occurs to me that this is simply another
> way to say
Miles,
If you are just trying to send/receive on a dynamic ip range, I would purchase
a cheap VPS and run something like Proxmox Mail Gateway, or a home-brew deal of
the same with a static IP, valid reverse dns, et al. Setup a WireGuard
connection server on the mail gateway, and then just prox
On 11/22/24 1:37 PM, Miles Fidelman via mailop wrote:
I'm reminded of the days of MMDF, and mail-uucp gateways and such.
chuckle
So, one answer to my problem is just to set up a copy of sendmail with
local delivery to an IPFS file. But, that leads me to wonder if anybody
is offering mail-ga
Am 22.11.2024 um 14:37:23 Uhr schrieb Miles Fidelman via mailop:
> So, one answer to my problem is just to set up a copy of sendmail
> with local delivery to an IPFS file.
sendmail can save mail to a local file with the local mailer. This file
includes all mail of one user.
Is that what you want?
It appears that Miles Fidelman via mailop said:
>So, one answer to my problem is just to set up a copy of sendmail with
>local delivery to an IPFS file. But, that leads me to wonder if anybody
>is offering mail-gateways as a service - be they free gateways or paid?
Gateways to what? The way yo
Hi Folks,
Apropos my earlier question of funneling mail to a server that doesn't
have a fixed IP address. It occurs to me that this is simply another
way to say "proxy server."
I'm reminded of the days of MMDF, and mail-uucp gateways and such.
So, one answer to my problem is just to set up
On 21. novembra 2024 22:37:24 UTC, Philipp Kern via mailop
wrote:
>$ whois -T inetnum hd-net
>$ whois -T inet6num belwue
>
>I don't think netname is guaranteed to be unique. It's not a primary key.
Yes, netname is not unique, multiple prefixes can be (and are)
named by the same. Thanks for comm
On 2024-11-21 at 17:37:24 UTC-0500 (Thu, 21 Nov 2024 23:37:24 +0100)
Philipp Kern via mailop
is rumored to have said:
On 11/21/24 5:58 PM, Slavko via mailop wrote:
On 21. novembra 2024 15:51:52 UTC, Marco Moock via mailop
wrote:
At least that works for me:
m@ryz:~$ whois 129.206.0.0 |grep
on Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 11:09:56AM -0500, Bill Cole via mailop wrote:
> Whois data is irregular, poorly-maintained, and often wrong. The various
> 'whois' clients offer differing UIs and capabilities. Whois servers provide
> responses in ungoverned formats.
Agreed. And increasingly cloaked, rate-l
Thanks
Of course, that makes sense. I mixed that up because there are so few even
sending reports. As of yet there were no negative ones incoming ever.
So someone else is attempting to TLS connect us and reports about that.
Because from the same report sender comes a dmarc report in the same tim
Am 04.11.24 um 17:14 schrieb Kris Deugau via mailop:
Take a closer look, and I'd bet all five of those specific messages
were sent through Google Groups. Number 2 and 3 I'm sure of as I've
got spamples myself.
Take a broader look and I'd bet you'll find more messages with
similar sender addr
18 matches
Mail list logo
