On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 09:33:14PM +0200, Marco Davids (SIDN) via mailop wrote:
> Why not try something completely different, like https://www.xmox.nl/ ?
>
> It installs in minutes (literally) and gives you, out-of-the-box, everything
> you want with regard to DMARC, DKIM, SPF, MTA-STS, STARTTLS
On Tue, 2024-07-16 at 07:40 +0800, Jeff Pang via mailop wrote:
> Any experience on opensmtpd on debian?
Just use postfix. You lose the OpenBSD security dust when running on
Debian, and the last time OpenSMTPD had a remote (root) code execution
vulnerability we all learned that it delivers mail wit
Any experience on opensmtpd on debian?
Thanks
On 2024-07-15 22:51, Jeroen via mailop wrote:
Hi,
When I deploy a new mailserver, I consider postfix, exim and qmail.
From practical experience, what are the advantages, disadvantages,
and adaptation scenarios of postfix, exim, and qmail?
We
Dňa 15. júla 2024 21:37:07 UTC používateľ Jeff Pang via mailop
napísal:
>4. Exim has more built-in features such as Dkim and customized transmap, but
>may be hard to setup correctly
Hard? Sure, it has not click-click configuration, one must know
what he want to setup, and then learn how to set
Hello
I have read every post you provided. Thanks so much. Now I know that,
1. Qmail is too old to be supported
2. Sendmail is a Primitive and complex system, not suggested
3. Postfix and Exim are main stream today
4. Exim has more built-in features such as Dkim and customized transmap,
but may
On Mon, 15 Jul 2024, Marco Moock via mailop wrote:
Am 15.07.2024 um 14:48:01 Uhr schrieb John Levine via mailop:
Sendmail is actively maintained and works fine, but configuring it
is hard and the documentation is a 30 year stream of consciousness.
The m4 macros are a bit tricky, but all poss
Op 15-07-2024 om 16:39 schreef Jeff Pang via mailop:
When I deploy a new mailserver, I consider postfix, exim and qmail.
Why not try something completely different, like https://www.xmox.nl/ ?
It installs in minutes (literally) and gives you, out-of-the-box,
everything you want with regard t
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 02:04:09PM -0500, Chris Adams via mailop wrote:
> I ran sendmail for many years, got my release notes entries to show for
> it. :) It was kind of neat to be able to do wacky things with what was
> essentially a programming language config, but now I think there's
> better w
Once upon a time, John Levine said:
> The usual suggestions are postfix and exim. Exim has somewhat more
> built in, e.g., DKIM signing, postfix seems somewhat more popular.
> Both are well supported on mailing lists with active help from the
> maintainers.
I think these are the only two major L
Am 15.07.2024 um 14:48:01 Uhr schrieb John Levine via mailop:
> Sendmail is actively maintained and works fine, but configuring it
> is hard and the documentation is a 30 year stream of consciousness.
The m4 macros are a bit tricky, but all possible after reading the
relevant parts of the bat-boo
According to Mark E. Mallett via mailop :
>On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 05:08:49PM +0200, Marco Moock via mailop wrote:
>> Am 15.07.2024 um 22:39:34 Uhr schrieb Jeff Pang via mailop:
>>
>> > When I deploy a new mailserver, I consider postfix, exim and qmail.
>>
>> At least when visiting the website, q
Am 15.07.2024 um 11:32:05 Uhr schrieb Anthony Howe via mailop:
> I prefer Sendmail 8.x, because that is what I started with and took
> great efforts to learn (spent money on The Bat book, was given a gold
> shirt :-D ).
I know the bat book (I found the PDF on a Russian ftp server), but
please exp
* Jeff Pang via mailop:
> Yes, it is not reasonable to classify spam emails solely based on the
> user's IP address or the majority weight of IP addresses.
You may think that, or wish it. Blacklists, be they public or in-house,
are actively used in the real world.
-Ralph
On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 7:55 AM Anthony Howe via mailop
wrote:
> Umm. Which unmaintained milters?
>
> If you have a problem with one of my milters or BarricadeMX let me know and
> I'll
> address it. Most of my work is now available on GitHub (12 milters and
> BarricadeMX aka smtpf).
I was look
On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 12:49 PM Alessandro Vesely via mailop
wrote:
> Did ARC seals verify?
We are not verifying arc seals at present, but rspamd seems to have
support, which is
a milter we are currently using, so that is worth investigating, thanks.
_
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 7:59 PM Grant Taylor via mailop
wrote:
> It's not BATV but it does help filter bogus use of the Null Reverse
> Path. Maybe this will help some.
>
> Link - SirWumpus/milter-null: Filter legitimate DSN and MDN messages
> from those generated as a result of spam backscatter.
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 4:14 PM Slavko via mailop wrote:
> I didn't notice which MTA you are using. Exim has tools for BATV
> signing and verification, i don't know how others.
Coincidentally, we just migrated from Exim to Postfix, so I think a
separate milter
is my only option at present.
__
On Mon, 2024-07-15 at 22:39 +0800, Jeff Pang via mailop wrote:
> Hello
>
> When I deploy a new mailserver, I consider postfix, exim and qmail.
>
> From practical experience, what are the advantages, disadvantages, and
> adaptation scenarios of postfix, exim, and qmail?
>
Forget qmail (and sen
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 05:08:49PM +0200, Marco Moock via mailop wrote:
> Am 15.07.2024 um 22:39:34 Uhr schrieb Jeff Pang via mailop:
>
> > When I deploy a new mailserver, I consider postfix, exim and qmail.
>
> At least when visiting the website, qmail's last release is more than
> 25 years ago.
I don't understand, what are your issues ? You appear to be a user
that opens up 10 threads per day about random topics.
If you manage an e-mail service that has issues with GMX then say so
and state the service-level issue you have.
If you are a user of GMX then you can contact their support.
S
On 2024-07-15 11:08, Marco Moock via mailop wrote:
Am 15.07.2024 um 22:39:34 Uhr schrieb Jeff Pang via mailop:
When I deploy a new mailserver, I consider postfix, exim and qmail.
At least when visiting the website, qmail's last release is more than
25 years ago. That is something I entirely d
On 2024-07-15, Jeff Pang via mailop wrote:
> When I deploy a new mailserver, I consider postfix, exim and qmail.
> From practical experience, what are the advantages, disadvantages, and
> adaptation scenarios of postfix, exim, and qmail?
I run exim on my servers and postfix on my laptops. I fin
Am 15.07.2024 um 22:39:34 Uhr schrieb Jeff Pang via mailop:
> When I deploy a new mailserver, I consider postfix, exim and qmail.
At least when visiting the website, qmail's last release is more than
25 years ago. That is something I entirely don't recommend to use.
> From practical experience,
Hi,
When I deploy a new mailserver, I consider postfix, exim and qmail.
From practical experience, what are the advantages, disadvantages, and
adaptation scenarios of postfix, exim, and qmail?
We have excellent experiences with OpenSMTPD - on OpenBSD. There is a
portable version too. The u
Hello
When I deploy a new mailserver, I consider postfix, exim and qmail.
From practical experience, what are the advantages, disadvantages, and
adaptation scenarios of postfix, exim, and qmail?
Regards
--
Jeff Pang
jeffp...@aol.com
___
mailop mai
On 2024-07-15 22:13, Al Iverson via mailop wrote:
Couple of questions...
- Isn't this list meant for communication around active operational
issues?
- Is how GMX designed outbound filtering really an operational issue?
GMX postmaster is on the list then he/she was kind enough to resolve out
Couple of questions...
- Isn't this list meant for communication around active operational issues?
- Is how GMX designed outbound filtering really an operational issue?
Cheers,
Al Iverson
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/
They best way is to address that in the egress router.
Most routers nowadays can have alerts and triggers based on traffic, so
simply create a router policy that sends an alert when too many tcp syn
packets out from an IP attempt to connect to remote IPs on port 25.
You can do this for many di
28 matches
Mail list logo
